- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Montana
- /
- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers v. Northern Plains Resource Council
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers v. Northern Plains Resource Council
Geography
Year
2019
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2019
Status
Application for stay granted in part.
Geography
Docket number
19A1053
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → U.S.
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US) → Clean Water Act (US)Federal Statutory Claims (US) → NEPA (US)
Principal law
United States → Administrative Procedure Act (APA)United States → Clean Water Act (CWA)United States → National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
At issue
Challenge to U.S Army Corps of Engineers approval of Keystone XL pipeline project under the reissued Nationwide Permit 12 for pipeline and utility projects.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
07/02/2020
Reply filed in support of application for stay pending appeal.
Reply
06/29/2020
Opposition filed to application for stay pending appeal.
Opposition
06/29/2020
Motion for leave to file amicus brief and brief filed by NextEra Energy, Inc.
Amicus Motion/Brief
06/23/2020
Motion for leave to file amicus brief and brief filed by West Virginia, Texas, and 16 other states.
Amicus Motion/Brief
06/17/2020
Brief filed by respondents TC Energy Corporation and TransCanada Keystone Pipeline LP in support of application for stay pending appeal.
Brief
06/17/2020
Brief filed by trade group respondents in support of application for stay pending appeal.
Brief
06/15/2020
Application for stay pending appeal submitted.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers submitted an application to Justice Kagan for stay pending appeal of a district court order that enjoined the authorization of new oil and gas pipelines under Nationwide Permit (NWP) 12 due to a failure to comply with the consultation requirements of the Endangered Species Act. The Ninth Circuit denied motions to stay in late May. The Corps argued to the Supreme Court that the district court “had no warrant” to set aside NWP 12 for the Keystone XL pipeline project, “let alone for the construction of all new oil and gas pipelines anywhere in the country.” The Corps contended that nationwide equitable relief was improper, that the order was issued without fair notice, and that the order lacked any sound basis in the Endangered Species Act.
Application
Summary
Challenge to U.S Army Corps of Engineers approval of Keystone XL pipeline project under the reissued Nationwide Permit 12 for pipeline and utility projects.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance