Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Wayúu Indigenous community and others v. Ministry of Environment and others

Geography
Year
2019
Document Type
Litigation

About this case

Filing year
2019
Status
Pending
Court/admin entity
ColombiaCouncil of StateAdministrative Tribunals
Case category
Suits against corporations, individuals (Global)Corporations (Global)Environmental assessment and permitting (Global)Suits against governments (Global)Environmental assessment and permitting (Global)Suits against governments (Global)Human Rights (Global)Other (Global)
Principal law
ColombiaConstitution of ColombiaColombiaGeneral Provisions on the Environment and Renewable Natural Resources (Law 99 of 1993)
At issue
Whether the environmental license of Cerrejón Zona Norte Coal Mining Project violates environmental provisions and human rights to FPIC, health and a healthy environment due to its effects on climate change and GHG emissions.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta

Summary

On February 22, 2019, the Wayúu Indigenous community of Northern Colombia and other individuals filed a lawsuit seeking the annulment of the environmental license (among other resolutions) that authorized the Cerrejón Zona Norte Coal Mining Project in La Guajira region since 1983. Plaintiffs claim that the environmental licensing process failed to comply with environmental provisions and principles, violating the rights of the Wayúu community and the general population to a healthy environment, human health, and free, prior and informed consent. Among petitioners’ requests is a study of all water bodies that are being affected by the mine operations including the costs in terms of ecosystem preservation and the health of the vulnerable communities. Particularly, plaintiffs argue that every natural resource exploitation project should consider the specificities and realities of climate change. Petitioners also claim that environmental licensing processes must analyze Colombia’s obligations to address climate change and Sustainable Development Goals – SDGs before issuing a permit. Among the plaintiffs’ arguments is that the Colombian government failed to consider the impact of coal mining on climate change when studying the environmental permit’s request. Plaintiffs invoked the correlation between coal mining and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to ask for the mine’s closure as a way to ensure the transition towards a cleaner energy and Colombia’s compliance with its international commitments. Finally, along with the main lawsuit, plaintiffs also asked for a precautionary measure that prevents the environmental authorities from issuing modification permits in this particular project. Petitioners argue that any expansion of the existing mining project could worsen the environmental harms and climate change effects.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance