Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

We Advocate Through Environmental Review v. County of Siskiyou

About this case

Filing year
2018
Status
Trial court judgment reversed and trial court instructed to enter a new judgment granting the petition for writ of mandate and specifying actions the County must take to comply with CEQA.
Docket number
C090840
Court/admin entity
Case category
Principal law
At issue
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
04/20/2022
Trial court judgment reversed and trial court instructed to enter a new judgment granting the petition for writ of mandate and specifying actions the County must take to comply with CEQA.
The California Court of Appeal held that the County of Siskiyou did not properly evaluate the climate change impacts of a facility that extracted groundwater to produce bottled water. The appellate court found that the County should have allowed an additional opportunity for the public to comment after it disclosed that the project would result in nearly double the greenhouse gas emissions that were disclosed before the initial public comment period. The appellate court also found that the stated project objectives were “unreasonably narrow” but rejected other arguments challenging the California Environmental Quality Act review, including arguments that the County potentially understated the project’s greenhouse gas emissions and that greenhouse gas mitigation measures were not enforceable.
Decision

Summary

Challenge to the California Environmental Quality Act review for a facility that extracted groundwater to produce bottle water.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience