Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Youth Verdict v. Waratah Coal

Geography
Year
2020
Document Type
Litigation

About this case

Filing year
2020
Status
Decided
Court/admin entity
AustraliaQueenslandLand Court
Case category
Suits against corporations, individuals (Global)Corporations (Global)Environmental assessment and permitting (Global)GHG emissions reduction (Global)
Principal law
AustraliaHuman Rights Act (Qld)
At issue
Australian youth challenged proposed coal mine on human rights grounds.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
11/25/2022
EDO's summary of the decision.
Press Release
11/25/2022
Decision by the Queensland Land Court.
Decision
03/18/2022
Waratah Coal Pty Ltd v Youth Verdict Ltd & Ors (No 5) [2022] QLC 4
Application
03/18/2022
Waratah Coal Pty Ltd v Youth Verdict Ltd & Ors (No 4) [2022] QLC 3
Application
10/05/2021
Waratah Coal Pty Ltd v Youth Verdict Ltd & Ors (No 3) [2021] QLC 36
Application
02/08/2021
Waratah Coal Pty Ltd v Youth Verdict Ltd & Ors (No 2) [2021] QLC 4
Application
08/07/2020
Waratah Coal Pty Ltd v Youth Verdict Ltd & Ors [2020] QLC 33
Application

Summary

On May 13, 2020, the environmental group Youth Verdict lodged an objection to the proposed Galilee Coal Project in the Queensland Land Court on human rights grounds. The plaintiffs allege that by contributing to climate change, the mine will infringe on their right to life, the protection of children, and the right to culture as protected by the Queensland Human Rights Act. Thus, approval of the mine would be unlawful. The Galilee Coal Project had received federal approval but needed a recommendation that it be approved by the Queensland Land Court before the environmental authority and mining lease could be granted by the Queensland Department of Environment and Science and Minister for Resources, respectively. The recommendations are not finally determinative but must be considered by the Minister for Natural Resources Mines and Energy and by the Chief Executive of the Department of Environment and Science when making a final decision on the mining lease. On August 28, 2020, the court denied the defendant's motion to dismiss the case. On November 25, 2022, the Queensland Land Court recommended to the Minister for Natural Resources Mines and Energy and the Chief Executive of the Department of Environment and Science that the Mining Lease and Environmental Authority respectively be rejected. In reaching this decision the Court considered factors including climate change, the economic and social benefits and costs and the limitation of human rights associated with the Project. The Court found that the development of the Project would unjustifiably limit the right to life, the protection of children, the right to culture of First Nations People, the right to property, the right of certain groups to enjoy human rights without discrimination, and the right to privacy and home. On December 2022 the Queensland Land Court recommended to the relevant ministerial bodies that the Mining Permit and the Environmental Authority be rejected. Waratah Coal Companye appealed the decision but withdrew it in February of the following year.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance