- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- District of Columbia
- /
- Zero Emission Transportation Association v. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Zero Emission Transportation Association v. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Geography
Year
2025
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2025
Status
Petitioner's motion to transfer to First Circuit granted.
Geography
Docket number
25-1167
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → D.C. Cir.
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims → Other Statutes and Regulations
Principal law
United States → Administrative Procedure Act (APA)United States → Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA)United States → Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA)
At issue
Challenge to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s interpretive rule on “Resetting the Corporate Average Fuel Economy Program.”
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
09/05/2025
Petitioner's motion to transfer to First Circuit granted.
Decision
08/11/2025
Motion to transfer filed by petitioner.
On August 11, 2025, ZETA filed a motion to transfer the petition for review to the First Circuit Court of Appeals where states and cities led by California had filed a challenge, and where the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation had consolidated a petition for review originally filed by the Center for Biological Diversity and other environmental groups in the D.C. Circuit.
Motion
08/06/2025
Petition for review filed.
Zero Emission Transportation Association (ZETA)—“an association of over three dozen companies committed to advocating for the advancement of the electric vehicle supply chain”—filed a petition for review in the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals challenging the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s (NHTSA’s) interpretive rule on “Resetting the Corporate Average Fuel Economy Program.” ZETA’s petition stated that the rule introduced a new interpretation of NHTSA’s authority to set fuel economy standards for new passenger vehicles and light-duty trucks and fuel-efficiency standards and compliance and enforcement protocols for new commercial medium- and heavy-duty on-highway vehicles and work trucks. ZETA also alleged that NHTSA had cited the rule as justification for refusing to issue compliance notifications to manufacturers, which prevented NHTSA from transferring credits earned by vehicles that exceed fuel efficiency standards to other vehicle manufacturers. ZETA asserted that the rule was contrary to the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, Energy Independence and Security Act, and other applicable law, and that it violated the Administrative Procedure Act.
Petition
Summary
Challenge to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s interpretive rule on “Resetting the Corporate Average Fuel Economy Program.”
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector