The federal district court for the Western District of Washington granted the State of Washington’s motion for a preliminary injunction barring federal defendants from terminating climate resilience funding awarded to the State in 2022 and 2023. The court rejected the federal defendants’ contentions that the suit raised “simply contractual claims disguised as [Administrative Procedure Act (APA )] claims” and that the Court of Federal Claims therefore had exclusive jurisdiction over the suit under the Tucker Act. The court found that the Washington sought to vindicate statutory and constitutional rights, not contractual rights, and that the relief sought—an injunction to obtain access to the funds—“is not properly characterized as money damages.” In addition, the court was persuaded by Washington’s argument that “cooperative agreements” such as those at issue in this case are not enforceable under the Tucker Act because they “do not confer a direct and tangible benefit” to the federal government. The court concluded that recent per curiam decisions by the Supreme Court did not require that the case be filed in the Court of Federal Claims; the court also distinguished recent D.C. Circuit and Fourth Circuit decisions finding that cases challenging termination of grant funds and found that these decisions were at odds with binding Ninth Circuit precedent. Considering the legal standard for granting a preliminary injunction, the court found that Washington was highly likely to succeed on its APA claims that the terminations were arbitrary and capricious and violated Office of Management and Budget regulations and related guidance. In addition, the court found that Washington was likely to succeed in demonstrating that the terminations violated the Spending Clause by imposing conditions well after the awards were granted. The court further found that the record was sufficient to show irreparable harm from the State’s decreased ability to protect overburdened communities and to prepare for the negative effects of climate change. The court wrote that “[t]hese are the kinds of injuries that money cannot necessarily solve, as lost time itself can make future response to climate change yet more difficult.” In addition, the court found that the balance of equities and public interest favored issuance of an injunction, rejecting the defendants’ contention that frustration of the President’s policies or an irreversible payment of funds outweighed countervailing interests. The court imposed a nominal $100 bond.

State of Washington's challenge to termination of two awards of federal funding that the State alleged it was “relying on to help communities disproportionately exposed to the adverse effects of climate change become more resilient.”

Washington v. U.S. Department of Commerce

<p>This entry was provided by the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law. Please see the terms of use for citation and licensing of third party data.</p>

Washington Federal Court Enjoined Federal Defendants from Terminating Climate Resilience Funding

Filed

The Climate Litigation Database

Find climate change litigation data and indicators for {text}.

{text} litigation

Sabin Center for Climate Change Law provides Climate Litigation Database, a comprehensive database of US and Global climate change caselaw

Quickly and easily search through the complete text of thousands of climate change law and policy documents from every country.

Search the Climate Litigation Database

An aim to achieve a quantifiable outcome within a given time-frame, set by an institution such as a national government.

Policy instruments are techniques or tools used by governing authorities to promote certain policies in order to achieve predetermined goals. Put simply, instruments are how a government tries to achieve its goals, with this taxonomy being focused on national policy instruments.

Risk is the potential for adverse consequences resulting from the dynamic interplay between (climate-related) hazards, exposure, and vulnerability of affected human or ecological systems.

Groups  of people who are adversely affected by climate change or the response to it

A set of principles, processes, and practices that build economic and political power to shift from an extractive economy to a regenerative economy.

Justice is the ethical and political framework that addresses fairness, including issues of responsibility, rights, and structural inequity.

Renewable energy means all forms of energy produced from renewable sources in a sustainable manner.

Fossil fuel is a generic term for non-renewable energy sources such as coal, fossil gas, and oil (including crude oil, and petroleum products), that can be used for electricity and heat generation. Fossil fuels are hydrocarbons formed from pressurised and heated organic material buried over millions of years.

Molecules in the atmosphere that play a key role in the greenhouse effect by trapping heat radiating from Earth’s surface.

Area of the economy in which actors engage in identical or related activities.

In human systems, the process of adjustment to actual or expected climate change and its effects, in order to moderate harm, increase resilience or exploit beneficial opportunities. In natural systems, the process of adjustment to actual climate change and its effects; human intervention may facilitate adjustment to expected climate change and its effects.

The management and allocation of funds, assets and investments to meet various objectives

Zoning and spatial planning are both methods for guiding the distribution of people and activities in a space, and are regulatory restriction.

Either money or something of monetary value is transferred between two or more organisations, people or countries.

Coastal zone and marine-related actions and measures to adapt and increase resilience to climate change

Actions or measures to adapt freshwater, coastal and marine systems to climate change.

Extreme weather refers to events where a weather variable exceeds (or falls below) a threshold. Meaning it is significantly different from the average or usual weather pattern.

People with different national or cultural traditions from the dominant population

Social and cultural groups that share collective ancestral ties to the lands and natural resources where they live, occupy or from which they have been displaced

woman and genders outside of the gender binary

This sector involves the wholesale and retail selling of goods.

This sector involves activities that impart knowledge and skills to individuals, including formal schooling, vocational training and educational support.

State of Washington's challenge to termination of two awards of federal funding that the State alleged it was “relying on to help communities disproportionately exposed to the adverse effects of climate change become more resilient.” 

Washington Federal Court Enjoined Federal Defendants from Terminating Climate Resilience Funding

Policy instrument

Risk

Impacted group

Greenhouse gas

Economic sector

Adaptation/resilience

Finance