- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- Evans v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Collection
Evans v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ↗
20-1180D.C. Cir.1 entry
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
Confederated Tribes of the Coos, Lower Umpqua and Siuslaw Indians v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ↗
20-1172D.C. Cir.1 entry
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
Rogue Riverkeeper v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ↗
20-1171D.C. Cir.1 entry
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
Jordan Cove Energy Project L.P. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ↗
20-1170D.C. Cir.1 entry
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
05/27/2020
Petition
Petition for review filed.
–
–
Evans v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ↗
20-1161D.C. Cir.12 entries
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
01/25/2022
Decision
FERC's motion to dismiss granted and record remanded to FERC.
The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (FERC’s) unopposed motion to dismiss proceedings challenging the Jordan Cove LNG Terminal and Pacific Connector Pipeline in Oregon and remand the record to FERC. As requested by FERC, the court ordered FERC to vacate authorizations for the project, consistent with FERC’s December 16, 2021 order, which vacated the authorizations subject to leave of the D.C. Circuit after the project’s developers informed FERC that they had decided not to move forward with the project because they had been unable to obtain necessary state authorizations.
11/01/2021
Decision
Record remanded to FERC.
On November 1, 2021, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals remanded the record to FERC for consideration of whether to impose a stay of a pipeline certification authorization related to the Jordan Cove liquefied natural gas export terminal in Oregon. The D.C. Circuit took this step after the project’s developers represented during oral argument that they were “reassessing” the project. On December 1, 2021, the developers notified FERC that they had decided not to move forward with the project due to concern “regarding their ability to obtain the necessary state permits.” They asked FERC to vacate its authorizations.