Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Evans v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

20-1180United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.), United States Federal Courts1 entry

Confederated Tribes of the Coos, Lower Umpqua and Siuslaw Indians v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

20-1172United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.), United States Federal Courts1 entry

Rogue Riverkeeper v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

20-1171United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.), United States Federal Courts1 entry
Filing Date
Document
Type

Evans v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

20-1161United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.), United States Federal Courts12 entries
Filing Date
Document
Type
01/25/2022
FERC's motion to dismiss granted and record remanded to FERC.
The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (FERC’s) unopposed motion to dismiss proceedings challenging the Jordan Cove LNG Terminal and Pacific Connector Pipeline in Oregon and remand the record to FERC. As requested by FERC, the court ordered FERC to vacate authorizations for the project, consistent with FERC’s December 16, 2021 order, which vacated the authorizations subject to leave of the D.C. Circuit after the project’s developers informed FERC that they had decided not to move forward with the project because they had been unable to obtain necessary state authorizations.
Decision
01/12/2022
Unopposed motion to dismiss and remand record to agency filed by FERC.
Motion
12/16/2021
Status Report
11/01/2021
Record remanded to FERC.
On November 1, 2021, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals remanded the record to FERC for consideration of whether to impose a stay of a pipeline certification authorization related to the Jordan Cove liquefied natural gas export terminal in Oregon. The D.C. Circuit took this step after the project’s developers represented during oral argument that they were “reassessing” the project. On December 1, 2021, the developers notified FERC that they had decided not to move forward with the project due to concern “regarding their ability to obtain the necessary state permits.” They asked FERC to vacate its authorizations.
Decision

Jordan Cove Energy Project L.P. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

20-1170United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.), United States Federal Courts2 entries
Filing Date
Document
Type
05/27/2020
Petition