Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database
Collection

Growth Energy v. EPA

National Wildlife Federation v. EPA 

19-1039D.C. Cir.1 entry
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
02/11/2019
Petition
Petition for review filed.

Valero Energy Corp. v. EPA 

19-1038D.C. Cir.1 entry
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
02/11/2019
Petition
Petition for review filed.

American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers v. EPA 

19-1037D.C. Cir.1 entry
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
02/11/2019
Petition
Petition for review filed.

Producers of Renewables United for Integrity Truth and Transparency v. EPA 

19-1036D.C. Cir.1 entry
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
02/09/2019
Petition
Petition for review filed.

National Biodiesel Board v. EPA 

19-1035D.C. Cir.1 entry
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
02/08/2019
Petition
Petition for review filed.

Small Retailers Coalition v. EPA 

19-1033D.C. Cir.1 entry
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
02/08/2019
Petition
Petition for review filed.

Monroe Energy, LLC v. EPA 

19-1032D.C. Cir.1 entry
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
02/08/2019
Petition
Petition for review filed.

RFS Power Coalition v. EPA 

19-1027 D.C. Cir.1 entry
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
02/07/2019
Petition
Petition for review filed.

Growth Energy v. EPA 

19-1023D.C. Cir.26 entries
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
10/04/2021
Decision
Petition for panel rehearing denied.
08/06/2021
Petition For Rehearing
Petition for panel rehearing filed by petitioner RFS Power Coalition.
07/16/2021
Decision
2019 Renewable Fuel Standard rule remanded without vacatur.
The D.C. Circuit largely rejected challenges to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) 2019 rule setting renewable fuel volumes in the Clean Air Act’s Renewable Fuel Standard Program. The court rejected all arguments by obligated parties and renewable fuel producers but agreed with environmental petitioners that EPA’s (1) determination that the rule would have no effect on endangered species or their critical habitat and (2) decision not to reduce applicable volumes to prevent severe environmental harm were at odds with the evidence in the administrative record.
03/18/2020
Decision
Motion to consolidate or coordinate or, in the alternative, hold in abeyance denied.