Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Growth Energy v. EPA

Geography
Year
2019
Document Type
Litigation
Part of

About this case

Filing year
2019
Status
Petition for panel rehearing denied.
Docket number
19-1023
Court/admin entity
United StatesUnited States Federal CourtsUnited States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.)
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US)Clean Air Act (US)Environmentalist Lawsuits (US)Industry Lawsuits (US)Renewable Fuel Standards (US)
Principal law
United StatesClean Air Act (CAA)United StatesEnergy Independence and Security Act (EISA)United StatesEnergy Policy Act of 2005
At issue
Challenge to EPA’s 2019 percentage standards for the Renewable Fuel Standard program and volume requirements for cellulosic biofuel, advanced biofuel, and total renewable fuel for 2019, and the applicable volume of biomass-based diesel for 2020.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
10/04/2021
Petition for panel rehearing denied.
Decision
08/06/2021
Petition for panel rehearing filed by petitioner RFS Power Coalition.
Petition For Rehearing
07/16/2021
2019 Renewable Fuel Standard rule remanded without vacatur.
The D.C. Circuit largely rejected challenges to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) 2019 rule setting renewable fuel volumes in the Clean Air Act’s Renewable Fuel Standard Program. The court rejected all arguments by obligated parties and renewable fuel producers but agreed with environmental petitioners that EPA’s (1) determination that the rule would have no effect on endangered species or their critical habitat and (2) decision not to reduce applicable volumes to prevent severe environmental harm were at odds with the evidence in the administrative record.
Decision
03/18/2020
Motion to consolidate or coordinate or, in the alternative, hold in abeyance denied.
Decision
02/20/2020
Joint reply brief filed by American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, Monroe Energy, LLC, Small Retailers Coalition, and Valero Energy Corp.
Reply
02/20/2020
Reply brief filed by environmental petitioners.
Reply
02/20/2020
Reply brief filed by petitioners Growth Energy, National Biodiesel Board, Producers of Renewables United for Integrity Truth and Transparency, and RFS Power Coalition.
Reply
01/23/2020
Brief filed by intervenors for respondent responding to renewable fuel producers.
Brief
01/23/2020
Brief filed by intervenors in response to environmental petitioners.
Brief
01/23/2020
Brief filed by intervenors Growth Energy, the National Biodiesel Board, and American Petroleum Institute in support of EPA.
Brief
01/09/2020
Initial brief filed by EPA.
Brief
10/04/2019
Opening brief filed by petitioners American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, Monroe Energy, Small Retailers Coalition, and Valero Energy.
Brief
10/04/2019
Opening brief filed by environmental petitioners.
Brief
10/04/2019
Initial brief filed by petitioners Growth Energy, the National Biodiesel Board, Producers of Renewables United for Integrity Truth and Transparency, and the RFS Power Coalition.
Brief
04/23/2019
Motions for leave to intervene granted.
Decision
03/26/2019
Joint reply filed by Growth Energy et al. to opposition to motion to sever.
Reply
03/21/2019
Opposition to motion to sever filed by American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers and Monroe Energy, LLC.
Opposition
03/19/2019
Opposition filed by EPA to biofuel petitioners' motion to sever the small refinery exemption issue.
Opposition
03/13/2019
Motion for leave to intervene filed by American Petroleum Institute.
Motion To Intervene
03/11/2019
Joint motion filed by Growth Energy et al. to sever their petitions and hold them in abeyance.
Motion
03/11/2019
Motion to intervene on behalf of the respondents filed by Growth Energy.
Motion To Intervene
03/11/2019
Motion to intervene in support of respondents filed by National Biodiesel Board.
Motion To Intervene
03/06/2019
Motion for leave to intervene in support of respondents filed by Monroe Energy, LLC.
Motion To Intervene
03/01/2019
Petition for review filed.
Trade associations, refiners, environmental organizations, and other parties filed petitions in the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals seeking review of EPA’s 2019 renewable fuel percentage standards for the Renewable Fuel Standard program. The challenged rule also set volume requirements for cellulosic biofuel, advanced biofuel, and total renewable fuel for 2019, and the applicable volume of biomass-based diesel for 2020. Petitioners included an ethanol trade association; a trade group representing the Biomass Power Association, the American Biogas Council, and the Energy Recovery Council; a petroleum products refiner; a trade group representing independent petroleum retailers and convenience stores; a biodiesel trade association; an “ad hoc working group of companies that own and operate biomass-based diesel and ethanol production plants and participate in the [RFS] program”; a transportation fuels refiner and owner of biofuel plants; and environmental and conservation groups.
Petition
03/01/2019
Motion filed by American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers for leave to intervene in support of respondent.
Motion To Intervene

Summary

Challenge to EPA’s 2019 percentage standards for the Renewable Fuel Standard program and volume requirements for cellulosic biofuel, advanced biofuel, and total renewable fuel for 2019, and the applicable volume of biomass-based diesel for 2020.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance