- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- NECEC Transmission LLC v. Bureau of Parks & Lands
Collection
NECEC Transmission LLC v. Bureau of Parks & Lands
NECEC Transmission LLC v. Bureau of Parks & Lands ↗
BCD-21-416Me.2 entries
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
08/30/2022
Decision
Case remanded for further proceedings.
In a challenge by the developers of the New England Clean Energy Connect (NECEC) project to a ballot question approved by Maine voters in 2021 that banned construction of certain electric transmission lines, the Maine Supreme Judicial Court remanded the case to the State’s Business and Consumer Docket for consideration of whether the developers had acquired vested rights to construct the project. The NECEC project is intended to carry hydroelectric power generated in Québec through Maine into Massachusetts. The court held that the ballot initiative would violate due process under the Maine Constitution to the extent that the developers had acquired vested rights.
NECEC Transmission LLC v. Bureau of Parks & Lands, Maine Department of Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry ↗
BCD-CIV-2021-58Me. Super. Ct.7 entries
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
04/20/2023
Verdict
Jury verdict for developers.
A jury issued a unanimous verdict finding that the developers of the New England Clean Energy Connect (NECEC) project—which would deliver hydropower from Canada to New England—had proved that they “undertook significant, visible construction” on the project prior to the November 2, 2021 vote approving a ballot initiative that blocked the project. The jury also found that the construction was undertaken in reliance on the Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity issued by the Maine Public Utilities Commission and “according to a schedule that was not created or expedited for the purpose of generating a vested rights claim.”
10/21/2022
Decision
Court denied plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration of denial of preliminary injunction.
After the Maine Law Court determined that a successful ballot initiative that blocked completion and operation of the New England Clean Energy Connection transmission line corridor might have violated the developers’ due process rights, the Maine Business and Consumer Court declined to reconsider its denial of a motion for a preliminary injunction barring the effectiveness of the ballot initiative. The court rejected the plaintiffs’ argument that the Law Court had determined that they had vested rights to complete construction. Instead, the court said, the Law Court had returned the case to the Business and Consumer Court for factfinding. The Business and Consumer Court said the plaintiffs had not argued that a “tipping point” after which completion of the project would no longer be feasible would occur while the case was being litigated in trial court, where a trial was scheduled to begin in April 2023.
12/16/2021
Decision
Motion for preliminary injunction denied.
The Maine Business and Consumer Court denied a motion for preliminary injunction barring the ballot initiative that banned completion and operation of the New England Clean Energy Connection transmission line corridor from taking effect. The court found that allowing the initiative to take effect would not violate the developers’ constitutional rights or constitutional principles, and that they had not demonstrated a substantial possibility of success on the merits of their challenge. Although the court acknowledged that the applicable law was uncertain, the court found that other factors would nonetheless be determinative, including because the developers would not suffer irreparable injury if the initiative took effect during the litigation and because the “paramount” public interest in participatory democracy would be adversely affected by an injunction. The court found that the economic harm to the developers, while “substantial,” would not outweigh this harm. Regarding arguments that failure to grant an injunction would have a negative climate impact, the court stated: “The question now is not whether climate change or direct construction poses a greater environmental threat; nor is the question what impact the Initiative will have on future economic investment in Maine. The question is whether, during the likely short lived litigation period, the harm from entering or refusing to enter a preliminary injunction will be worse.” The court concluded the balance of harm favored the defendants. The case is <a href="https://www.mainepublic.org/business-and-economy/2022-01-04/battle-over-cmp-transmission-corridor-goes-to-maine-supreme-court">now before</a> the Maine Supreme Judicial Court, sitting as the Law Court, in which it decides appeals on questions of law that arise in cases in the lower courts. Initial briefs from the initiative’s opponents are due February 28, 2022.