Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

West Virginia v. EPA

Electric Generators for a Sensible Transition v. EPA 

24A106U.S.1 entry
Filing Date
Document
Type
07/26/2024
Emergency application for immediate stay filed.
Application

Midwest Ozone Group v. EPA 

24A105U.S.1 entry
Filing Date
Document
Type
07/26/2024
Emergency application for immediate stay filed.
Application

NACCO Natural Resources Corp. v. EPA 

24A98 U.S.1 entry
Filing Date
Document
Type
07/24/2024
Emergency application for immediate stay filed.
Application

National Mining Association v. EPA 

24A97U.S.1 entry
Filing Date
Document
Type
07/24/2024
Application for immediate stay filed.
Application

National Rural Electric Cooperative v. EPA 

24A96 U.S.1 entry
Filing Date
Document
Type
07/24/2024
Application

West Virginia v. EPA 

24A95U.S.2 entries
Filing Date
Document
Type
10/16/2024
Emergency applications for immediate stay denied.
The U.S. Supreme Court denied eight emergency applications for immediate stay of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency final rule establishing new greenhouse gas emissions standards and guidelines for new and existing fossil fuel-fired electric generating units. Justice Thomas would have granted the stay. Justice Alito did not participate in the consideration or decision of the applications. Justice Kavanaugh, joined by Justice Gorsuch, wrote a statement indicating that in his view, “the applicants have shown a strong likelihood of success on the merits as to at least some of their challenges” but that they were unlikely to suffer irreparable harm before the D.C. Circuit decided the merits because compliance work was not required until June 2025.
Decision
07/23/2024
States filed emergency application for an immediate stay of administrative action pending review in the D.C. Circuit.
After the D.C. Circuit denied requests for a stay, six emergency applications, including one filed by West Virginia and other states, were submitted to Chief Justice Roberts seeking an immediate stay. Chief Justice Roberts requested a response to the applications by August 19. The arguments in the applications to the Supreme Court for an emergency stay included that the final rule is “déjà vu all over again” because the final rule was “no less problematic” than the Clean Power Plan. The states contended that the final rule set “impossible-to-meet standards” that would impose “major, jarring shifts in the nation’s power market,” forcing closure of coal-fired plants.
Application

Idaho Power Co. v. EPA 

24-1155United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.)1 entry
Filing Date
Document
Type
05/22/2024
Petition

NACCO Natural Resources Corp. v. EPA 

24-1153United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.)2 entries
Filing Date
Document
Type
05/22/2024
NACCO joined the state petitioners' motion for stay.
Motion
05/22/2024
Petition

Edison Electric Institute v. EPA 

24-1152United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.)2 entries
Filing Date
Document
Type
05/24/2024
Motion for stay filed by Edison Electric Institute, Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co., and Idaho Power Co.
Motion
05/22/2024
Petition

Midwest Ozone Group v. EPA 

24-1146United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.)2 entries
Filing Date
Document
Type
05/24/2024
Motion
05/21/2024
Petition

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO v. EPA 

24-1143United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.)1 entry
Filing Date
Document
Type

United Mine Workers of America, AFL-CIO v. EPA 

24-1142United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.)1 entry
Filing Date
Document
Type

Electric Generators for a Sensible Transition v. EPA 

24-1128United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.)2 entries
Filing Date
Document
Type
05/24/2024
Motion for stay pending judicial review filed.
Motion

Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. EPA 

24-1126United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.)1 entry
Filing Date
Document
Type
05/10/2024
Petition

National Mining Association v. EPA 

24-1124 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.)1 entry
Filing Date
Document
Type
05/09/2024
Petition

National Rural Electric Cooperative Association v. EPA 

24-1122United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.)2 entries
Filing Date
Document
Type

Ohio v. EPA 

24-1121United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.)2 entries
Filing Date
Document
Type
05/21/2024
Motion for stay pending review filed by Ohio and Kansas.
Motion
05/09/2024
Petition for review filed.
Petition

West Virginia v. EPA 

24-1120United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.)14 entries
Filing Date
Document
Type
04/25/2025
Respondents' motion to hold case in abeyance granted.
On April 25, 2025, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s motion asking the court to continue holding in abeyance the challenges to the final rule establishing new greenhouse gas emissions standards and guidelines for new and existing fossil fuel-fired electric generating units. The final rule also revoked the first Trump administration’s Affordable Clean Energy Rule. EPA said it had decided to initiate a new rulemaking process to reassess the rule and that it intended to issue a proposed reconsideration rule in spring 2025 and a final rule by December 2025.
Decision
04/21/2025
Unopposed motion to hold case in abeyance filed by respondents.
Motion
02/19/2025
Unopposed motion to hold cases in abeyance for 60 days granted.
Decision
02/05/2025
Unopposed motion to hold cases in abeyance for 60 days filed.
Motion