- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- Western States Trucking Association, Inc. v. EPA
Western States Trucking Association, Inc. v. EPA
Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, Inc. v. EPA ↗
23-1148United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.)1 entry
Filing Date
Document
Type
06/05/2023
Petition for review filed.
Petition
The 200 for Homeownership v. EPA ↗
23-1147United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.)1 entry
Filing Date
Document
Type
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers v. EPA ↗
23-1146United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.)1 entry
Filing Date
Document
Type
06/05/2023
Petition for review filed.
Petition
Illinois Soybean Association v. EPA ↗
23-1145United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.)1 entry
Filing Date
Document
Type
06/05/2023
Petition for review filed.
Petition
Iowa v. EPA ↗
23-1144United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.)1 entry
Filing Date
Document
Type
Western States Trucking Association, Inc. v. EPA ↗
23-1143United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.)11 entries
Filing Date
Document
Type
12/04/2023
Private petitioners filed response in opposition to EPA's motion to hold case in abeyance.
Opposition
12/04/2023
State petitioners filed opposition to motion to hold appeal in abeyance.
Opposition
11/24/2023
Motion to hold case in abeyance filed by EPA.
On November 24, 2023, EPA filed a motion in the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals requesting that the court suspend briefing in cases challenging EPA’s Clean Air Act preemption waiver for California regulations establishing standards and requirements for heavy-duty vehicles and engines. EPA said it had become apparent after the petitioners submitted their opening briefs that “the large majority of issues” presented in these cases were already before the court in the pending cases challenging EPA’s reinstatement of California’s preemption waiver for light-duty vehicle greenhouse gas emissions standards (<a href="https://climatecasechart.com/case/ohio-v-epa/">Ohio v. EPA</a>) and EPA’s own standards for greenhouse gas emissions from light-duty vehicles (<a href="https://climatecasechart.com/case/texas-v-epa-2/">Texas v. EPA</a>). EPA argued that it therefore would promote judicial efficiency and preserve parties’ resources to hold the challenges to the heavy-duty vehicle waiver in abeyance until the D.C. Circuit issues decisions in the other cases. The overlapping arguments include issues regarding the constitutionality of the waiver provision; questions regarding statutory interpretation of the Clean Air Act’s waiver provision and the relevance of the major questions doctrine, federalism canon, and constitutional avoidance canon; and disputes regarding whether EPA’s standards amount to an impermissible electric vehicle mandate. All petitioners who expressed a position on EPA’s motion opposed it.
Motion
11/13/2023
Brief filed by amicus curiae The Sulphur Institute.
Amicus Motion/Brief