- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- Western States Trucking Association, Inc. v. EPA
Collection
Western States Trucking Association, Inc. v. EPA
Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, Inc. v. EPA ↗
23-1148D.C. Cir.1 entry
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers v. EPA ↗
23-1146D.C. Cir.1 entry
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
Illinois Soybean Association v. EPA ↗
23-1145D.C. Cir.1 entry
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
Western States Trucking Association, Inc. v. EPA ↗
23-1143D.C. Cir.11 entries
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
12/04/2023
Opposition
Private petitioners filed response in opposition to EPA's motion to hold case in abeyance.
–
11/24/2023
Motion
Motion to hold case in abeyance filed by EPA.
On November 24, 2023, EPA filed a motion in the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals requesting that the court suspend briefing in cases challenging EPA’s Clean Air Act preemption waiver for California regulations establishing standards and requirements for heavy-duty vehicles and engines. EPA said it had become apparent after the petitioners submitted their opening briefs that “the large majority of issues” presented in these cases were already before the court in the pending cases challenging EPA’s reinstatement of California’s preemption waiver for light-duty vehicle greenhouse gas emissions standards (<a href="https://climatecasechart.com/case/ohio-v-epa/">Ohio v. EPA</a>) and EPA’s own standards for greenhouse gas emissions from light-duty vehicles (<a href="https://climatecasechart.com/case/texas-v-epa-2/">Texas v. EPA</a>). EPA argued that it therefore would promote judicial efficiency and preserve parties’ resources to hold the challenges to the heavy-duty vehicle waiver in abeyance until the D.C. Circuit issues decisions in the other cases. The overlapping arguments include issues regarding the constitutionality of the waiver provision; questions regarding statutory interpretation of the Clean Air Act’s waiver provision and the relevance of the major questions doctrine, federalism canon, and constitutional avoidance canon; and disputes regarding whether EPA’s standards amount to an impermissible electric vehicle mandate. All petitioners who expressed a position on EPA’s motion opposed it.