- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- District of Columbia
- /
- Western States Trucking Association, Inc. v. EPA
Litigation
Western States Trucking Association, Inc. v. EPA
About this case
Documents
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
12/04/2023
Opposition
Private petitioners filed response in opposition to EPA's motion to hold case in abeyance.
–
11/24/2023
Motion
Motion to hold case in abeyance filed by EPA.
On November 24, 2023, EPA filed a motion in the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals requesting that the court suspend briefing in cases challenging EPA’s Clean Air Act preemption waiver for California regulations establishing standards and requirements for heavy-duty vehicles and engines. EPA said it had become apparent after the petitioners submitted their opening briefs that “the large majority of issues” presented in these cases were already before the court in the pending cases challenging EPA’s reinstatement of California’s preemption waiver for light-duty vehicle greenhouse gas emissions standards (<a href="https://climatecasechart.com/case/ohio-v-epa/">Ohio v. EPA</a>) and EPA’s own standards for greenhouse gas emissions from light-duty vehicles (<a href="https://climatecasechart.com/case/texas-v-epa-2/">Texas v. EPA</a>). EPA argued that it therefore would promote judicial efficiency and preserve parties’ resources to hold the challenges to the heavy-duty vehicle waiver in abeyance until the D.C. Circuit issues decisions in the other cases. The overlapping arguments include issues regarding the constitutionality of the waiver provision; questions regarding statutory interpretation of the Clean Air Act’s waiver provision and the relevance of the major questions doctrine, federalism canon, and constitutional avoidance canon; and disputes regarding whether EPA’s standards amount to an impermissible electric vehicle mandate. All petitioners who expressed a position on EPA’s motion opposed it.
11/13/2023
Amicus Motion/Brief
Brief filed by amici curiae Chamber of Commerce for the United States et al. in support of petitioners.
–
06/29/2023
Motion To Intervene
Motion filed by public interest organizations for leave to intervene in support of respondents.
–
06/29/2023
Motion To Intervene
Motion filed by environmental justice organizations to intervene in support of respondents.
–
06/28/2023
Motion To Intervene
Motion for leave to intervene in support of respondents filed by California, other states, D.C., Los Angeles, and New York City.
–
06/05/2023
Petition
Petition for review filed.
Six petitions for review were filed in the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals challenging EPA’s final action granting the California Air Resources Board’s requests for waivers of Clean Air Act preemption for four sets of standards for heavy-duty onroad vehicles and engines: (1) the Heavy-Duty Vehicle and Engine Emission Warranty Regulations and Maintenance Provisions; (2) the Advanced Clean Trucks Regulation; (3) the Zero Emission Airport Shuttle Regulation; and (4) the Zero-Emission Power Train Certification Regulation. The petitioners included trade associations representing various industries, including the biofuel industry; 19 states (led by Iowa); advocacy groups; and local water districts in California that operate fleets affected by the regulations.
Summary
Challenge to EPA's granting of California's requests for waivers of Clean Air Act preemption for four sets of heavy-duty onroad vehicle and engine standards.