Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Advertising Standards Authority’s Ruling on Shell UK Ltd.’s Shell Go+ Campaign

Geography
Year
2020
Document Type
Litigation

About this case

Filing year
2020
Status
Decided
Court/admin entity
United KingdomAdvertising Standards Authority (ASA)
Case category
Suits against corporations, individuals (Global)Corporations (Global)Misleading advertising (Global)
Principal law
At issue
Whether Shell UK’s advertising claim to “drive carbon-neutral” was misleading to consumers.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Summary

In January 2020, Shell UK Ltd. launched a radio advertising campaign for its Shell Go+ loyalty scheme. The United Kingdom’s Advertising Standards Authority subsequently received 17 complaints challenging claims made in the campaign, arguing that Shell’s statement that the scheme allowed customers to “Drive carbon-neutral” was misleading. In response to these challenges and the ASA’s investigation, Shell stated that its carbon-neutral claim was supported by offsetting carbon emissions from consumer fuel purchases made with a Shell Go+ membership. When a fuel purchase is made by a consumer with a Shell Go+ membership, Shell purchases carbon credits to offset the lifecycle carbon emissions of the fuel purchase. However, Shell's advertisement did not mention that Shell Go+ was a loyalty scheme. As such, the ASA concluded that the advertisement was misleading, as consumers were likely to infer that Shell Go+ was a new, carbon-neutral fuel rather than a carbon offsetting loyalty scheme, based on the "drive-carbon neutral" claims made by Shell in the advertisement. On June 8th 2020, the ASA ruled that the advertisement breached BCAP Code rules on misleading advertising (3.1) and environmental claims (9.2 and 9.3). The ASA stipulated that the advertisement must appear in the “complained of” form and that Shell UK Ltd must clarify that carbon offsetting is contingent on membership of a loyalty scheme. Shell has been subject to multiple further ASA investigations and rulings. Shell has continued to face ASA actions for misleading environmental claims.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Impacted group
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance