Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Alaska Community Action on Toxics v. Council on Environmental Quality

About this case

Filing year
2020
Status
Joint status report and unopposed motion to extend stay of case by 120 days filed.
Docket number
3:20-cv-5199
Court/admin entity
United StatesUnited States District Court for the Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.)United StatesUnited States Federal Courts
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US)NEPA (US)
Principal law
United StatesAdministrative Procedure Act (APA)United StatesNational Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
At issue
Challenge to amendments to the National Environmental Policy Act regulations.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
07/17/2023
Joint status report and unopposed motion to extend stay of case by 120 days filed.
Status Report
03/06/2023
Decision
11/03/2022
Parties filed joint status report and unopposed motion to extend stay by 120 days.
Status Report
06/24/2022
Decision
06/23/2022
Joint status report and unopposed motion to extend stay of case by 120 days filed.
Status Report
10/28/2021
Joint status report and unopposed motion to extend stay of case by 120 days filed.
Status Report
09/17/2021
Motions to dismiss denied without prejudice with permission to renew by notice when stay is lifted.
Decision
08/06/2021
Stay of case extended by 90 days and status conference scheduled for November 4, 2021.
Decision
04/09/2021
Case stayed until May 28, 2021 and status conference scheduled for June 3, 2021 (subsequently continued to June 10), with a joint status report due at least one week in advance.
Decision
04/08/2021
Parties filed joint status report and stipulation to extend stay of case by 45 days.
Status Report
02/11/2021
Stipulation
07/29/2020
Complaint filed.
Environmental groups filed a lawsuit in the federal district court for the District of Alaska challenging the Council on Environmental Quality’s (CEQ’s) amendments to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) regulations. The plaintiffs asserted that CEQ should have prepared an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement under the existing regulations to evaluate the amendments’ impacts, including environmental justice impacts and impacts on efforts to limit greenhouse gas emissions and to evaluate how a changing climate affects proposed projects. The Alaska plaintiffs also asserted that CEQ failed to comply with NEPA and/or the Administrative Procedure Act by failing to review environmental justice impacts, by violating standards that apply to agency decision-making, by promulgating rules that are contrary to the plain language and purpose of NEPA, and by invalidly attempting to amend statutory thresholds for judicial review.
Complaint

Summary

Challenge to amendments to the National Environmental Policy Act regulations.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance