- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- California
- /
- Alaska Community Action on Toxics v. Council on En...
Litigation
Alaska Community Action on Toxics v. Council on Environmental Quality
Date
2020
Geography
About this case
Documents
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
07/17/2023
Status Report
Joint status report and unopposed motion to extend stay of case by 120 days filed.
–
11/03/2022
Status Report
Parties filed joint status report and unopposed motion to extend stay by 120 days.
–
06/23/2022
Status Report
Joint status report and unopposed motion to extend stay of case by 120 days filed.
–
10/28/2021
Status Report
Joint status report and unopposed motion to extend stay of case by 120 days filed.
–
09/17/2021
Decision
Motions to dismiss denied without prejudice with permission to renew by notice when stay is lifted.
–
08/06/2021
Decision
Stay of case extended by 90 days and status conference scheduled for November 4, 2021.
–
04/09/2021
Decision
Case stayed until May 28, 2021 and status conference scheduled for June 3, 2021 (subsequently continued to June 10), with a joint status report due at least one week in advance.
–
04/08/2021
Status Report
Parties filed joint status report and stipulation to extend stay of case by 45 days.
–
07/29/2020
Complaint
Complaint filed.
Environmental groups filed a lawsuit in the federal district court for the District of Alaska challenging the Council on Environmental Quality’s (CEQ’s) amendments to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) regulations. The plaintiffs asserted that CEQ should have prepared an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement under the existing regulations to evaluate the amendments’ impacts, including environmental justice impacts and impacts on efforts to limit greenhouse gas emissions and to evaluate how a changing climate affects proposed projects. The Alaska plaintiffs also asserted that CEQ failed to comply with NEPA and/or the Administrative Procedure Act by failing to review environmental justice impacts, by violating standards that apply to agency decision-making, by promulgating rules that are contrary to the plain language and purpose of NEPA, and by invalidly attempting to amend statutory thresholds for judicial review.
Summary
Challenge to amendments to the National Environmental Policy Act regulations.