- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Texas
- /
- American Stewards of Liberty v. Department of the Interior
American Stewards of Liberty v. Department of the Interior
Geography
Year
2015
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2015
Status
2017 finding on delisting petition vacated and remanded for further consideration.
Geography
Docket number
1:15-cv-1174
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (W.D. Tex.)
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US) → Endangered Species Act and Other Wildlife Protection Statutes (US)
Principal law
United States → Endangered Species Act (ESA)
At issue
Challenge to denial of delisting petition for bone cave harvestman.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
03/28/2019
2017 finding on delisting petition vacated and remanded for further consideration.
The federal district court for the Western District of Texas found that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) had acted arbitrarily and capriciously when it denied a petition to remove the bone cave harvestman—“an elusive spider known to inhabit only Travis and Williamson Counties, Texas”—from the list of endangered species. The court found that the FWS violated its own regulations by requiring that the petition “essentially present conclusive evidence about the harvestman’s population trends—more evidence than the Service admits is available or attainable.” The FWS had cited the absence of population data, including the absence of “trend analysis to indicate that this species can withstand the threats associated with development or climate change over the long term,” as grounds for its conclusion that the petition did not present sufficient information to demonstrate that delisting might be warranted. The court concluded that the FWS did not deny the petition based on the best available data, as required by the Endangered Species Act and the FWS regulations, because it denied the petition based on the absence of “admittedly unavailable” evidence. The court concluded that the petition met the threshold for a finding that delisting may be warranted and remanded to the FWS for further consideration.
Decision
Summary
Challenge to denial of delisting petition for bone cave harvestman.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience