- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- New York
- /
- ARE-East River Science Park, LLC v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.
ARE-East River Science Park, LLC v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.
Geography
Year
2024
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2024
Status
First amended complaint filed.
Geography
Docket number
1:24-cv-05956
Court/admin entity
United States → United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.)United States → United States Federal Courts
Case category
Adaptation (US) → Challenges to adaptation measures (US)
Principal law
United States → Contract LawUnited States → Fraudulent Inducement
At issue
Developer's lawsuit alleging that the defendants fraudulently induced the developer into incorporating a floodwall into a planned new commercial life sciences building along the East River in Manhattan.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
01/24/2025
First amended complaint filed.
Complaint
08/06/2024
Complaint filed.
The developer of a commercial life science facility along the East River in Manhattan filed a lawsuit in the federal district court for the Southern District of New York alleging that New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation (H+H) and New York City Economic Development Corporation (EDC) had engaged in a fraudulent scheme to induce the developer into committing to incorporate a floodwall into a new building’s foundation. The complaint alleged that the defendants had determined after Superstorm Sandy that it was “imperative” to construct the floodwall and that the developer had agreed to cooperate with the defendants to integrate the floodwall into the new building’s foundation. The developer alleged that H+H and EDC concealed from it that floodwall design criteria were not final, that construction of the facility would be delayed for years, and that the developer would not be reimbursed for its floodwall-related costs. The developer alleged that it had sustained tens of millions of dollars in damages and millions of dollars in lost profits and had been denied “the benefits and fruits of its contractual option.” The complaint asserted causes of action for fraudulent inducement or, alternatively, breach of contract.
Complaint
Summary
Developer's lawsuit alleging that the defendants fraudulently induced the developer into incorporating a floodwall into a planned new commercial life sciences building along the East River in Manhattan.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Just transition
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance