- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Maryland
- /
- BP p.l.c. v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore
BP p.l.c. v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore
Geography
Year
2018
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2018
Status
Application for stay denied.
Geography
Docket number
19A368
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → U.S.
Case category
Adaptation → Actions seeking money damages for lossesCommon Law Claims
Principal law
United States → State Law–Strict LiabilityUnited States → State Law—NegligenceUnited States → State Law—NuisanceUnited States → State Law—Trespass
At issue
City of Baltimore lawsuit seeking to hold fossil fuel companies liable for climate change impacts.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
10/22/2019
Application for stay denied.
On October 22, 2019, the U.S. Supreme Court denied fossil fuel companies’ application for a stay pending appeal of a district court’s remand order returning Baltimore’s lawsuit seeking to hold the companies liable for impacts of climate change. The application was presented to Chief Justice Roberts, the circuit justice for the Fourth Circuit, who referred the application to the Court. The Court’s order denying the application indicated that Justice Alito did not take part in the consideration or decision of the application. The companies’ appeal of the remand order in Baltimore’s case has been fully briefed in the Fourth Circuit and is scheduled for oral argument on December 11. As of November 5, the district court in Maryland had not yet issued an order to lift its temporary stay on the remand order.
Decision
10/18/2019
Opposition filed to application for stay of remand order pending appeal.
Opposition
10/04/2019
National Association of Manufacturers filed motion for leave to file an amicus brief in support of the application to stay the remand order pending appeal.
Amicus Motion/Brief
10/01/2019
Defendants filed application to stay district court's remand order pending appeal and request for immediate administrative stay.
On the same day that the Fourth Circuit denied the fossil fuel companies' motion for a stay pending appeal of the district court's remand order, the companies filed an application for a stay in the U.S. Supreme Court. The application was directed to Chief Justice John Roberts, the circuit justice for the Fourth Circuit.
Application
Summary
City of Baltimore lawsuit seeking to hold fossil fuel companies liable for climate change impacts.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience