- Climate Litigation Database
 - /
 - Search
 - /
 - United States
 - /
 - District of Columbia
 - /
 - Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Department...
 
Litigation
Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Department of the Interior
Date
2022
Geography
About this case
Documents
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
11/01/2023
Decision
Intervenor-defendants' motion to dismiss granted.
The federal district court for the District of Columbia dismissed for lack of standing a lawsuit brought by four environmental organizations to challenge more than 4,000 federal approvals of applications for permit to drill for oil and gas in New Mexico and Wyoming. The court found that the organizations failed to establish associational standing because they did not allege any individual member’s “geographic nexus to any specific well or drilling sites” affected by challenged individual APDs. The court also found that the one organization that argued that it had organizational standing failed to connect its mission to any particular APD approval or to connect changes in its resources needs to the approvals.
04/07/2023
Reply
Reply filed by defendant-intervenors Petroleum Association of Wyoming et al. in support of motion to sever and transfer.
–
04/07/2023
Reply
Reply memorandum filed by plaintiff conservation groups to defendants' response to intervenor-defendants' consolidated motion to dismiss.
–
04/07/2023
Reply
Reply memorandum filed by intervenor-defendants in support of consolidated motion to dismiss.
–
03/17/2023
Response
Memorandum filed by conservation groups in response to intervenor-defendants' consolidated motion to dismiss.
–
03/17/2023
Response
Memorandum filed by plaintiff conservation groups in support of response to intervenors' motion to sever and transfer.
–
03/17/2023
Response
Response filed by defendants to defendant-intervenors' consolidated motion to dismiss.
–
03/17/2023
Response
Response filed by defendants in opposition to defendant-intervenors' motion to sever and transfer.
–
01/20/2023
Motion
Joinder filed by State of Wyoming in support of defendant-intervenors' motion to sever and transfer.
–
01/20/2023
Motion
Motion to sever and transfer filed by defendant-intervenors Petroleum Association of Wyoming et al.
–
01/20/2023
Motion To Dismiss
Memorandum filed by intervenor-defendants in support of consolidated motion to dismiss.
–
11/09/2022
Decision
Motions to intervene granted.
The federal district court for the District of Columbia granted motions to intervene on behalf of the defendants in conservation groups’ lawsuit challenging the U.S. Bureau of Land Management’s approval of more than 4,000 applications for permits to drill (APDs) for oil and gas in New Mexico and Wyoming. The court found that companies holding the challenged APDs, industry trade associations, and the State of Wyoming had standing and satisfied requirements to intervene as of right.
11/04/2022
Motion To Dismiss
Memorandum filed in support of Franklin Mountain Energy, LLC's motion to dismiss plaintiffs' amended complaint.
–
10/21/2022
Motion To Dismiss
Memorandum in support of motion to dismiss filed by American Petroleum Institute et al.
–
08/15/2022
Motion To Intervene
Motion to intervene as defendant-intervenor filed by New Mexico Oil and Gas Association.
–
08/05/2022
Motion To Intervene
Motion to intervene as defendant filed by Peak Powder River Resources, LLC.
–
08/02/2022
Motion To Intervene
Memorandum filed by State of Wyoming in support of its motion to intervene.
–
07/28/2022
Motion To Intervene
Motion for leave to intervene as a defendant filed by the American Petroleum Institute.
–
07/20/2022
Motion To Intervene
Motion to intervene as a defendant and statement of law in support filed by Petroleum Association of Wyoming.
–
07/01/2022
Motion To Intervene
Motion to intervene in support of defendants and memorandum of law in support filed by OXY USA Inc., OXY USA WTP LP, and Anadarko E&P Onshore LLC.
–
06/15/2022
Complaint
Complaint filed.
Center for Biological Diversity and WildEarth Guardians filed a lawsuit in the federal district court for the District of Columbia challenging approval of at least 3,535 applications for permit to drill (APDs) for oil and gas in the Permian Basin in New Mexico and in the Powder River Basin in Wyoming. The plaintiffs asserted climate change-related violations of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Endangered Species Act, and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA). Under NEPA, the plaintiffs alleged a failure to take a hard look at cumulative greenhouse gas emissions and the resulting climate impacts and to use available tools for assessing the impacts of greenhouse gas emissions from production and combustion of mineral resources authorized by the APDs. They also alleged a failure to consider environmental justice implications of increased greenhouse gas emissions and cumulative climate impacts. Under the Endangered Species Act, the plaintiffs asserted a failure to consult and reinitiate consultation on climate-threatened species. Under FLPMA, they asserted a failure to “take action necessary to prevent unnecessary or undue degradation in the context of climate impacts.”
Summary
Challenge to approval of at least 3,535 applications for permit to drill (APDs) for oil and gas in the Permian Basin in New Mexico and in the Powder River Basin in Wyoming.