- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Washington
- /
- Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Geography
Year
2025
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2025
Status
Complaint filed.
Geography
Docket number
3:25-cv-05160
Court/admin entity
United States → United States District Court for the Western District of Washington (W.D. Wash.)United States → United States Federal Courts
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US) → Endangered Species Act and Other Wildlife Protection Statutes (US)
Principal law
United States → Administrative Procedure Act (APA)United States → Endangered Species Act (ESA)
At issue
Challenge to the decision that listing the sand-verbena moth as endangered or threatened was not warranted.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
02/26/2025
Complaint filed.
Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) challenged the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s determination that the sand-verbena moth did not warrant listing as endangered or threatened under the Endangered Species Act. In the complaint, filed in the federal district court for the Western District of Washington, CBD alleged that only six confirmed populations of the moth remained because shoreline development had destroyed the moth’s dune habitat and invasive plants had crowded out the yellow sand-verbena on which it depends. The complaint further alleged that sea level rise would inundate much of the moth’s remaining habitat, posing an additional threat to the moth’s long-term viability and that FWS had projected that four or five of the moth populations would be entirely extirpated by 2100, “depending on whether there is a low- or high-end greenhouse gas emissions outcome.” CBD asserted that FWS violated the Endangered Species Act and Administrative Procedure Act, including by unlawfully determining that 2100 was not the foreseeable future.
Complaint
Summary
Challenge to the decision that listing the sand-verbena moth as endangered or threatened was not warranted.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Risk
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance