Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Coastal Ratepayers Union v. Kāpiti Coast District Council

Geography
Date
2025
Document type
Litigation

About this case

Filing year
2025
Status
Decided
Court/admin entity
New ZealandWelling High Court
Case category
Suits against governmentsAccess to information
Principal law
New ZealandLocal Government Act 2002New ZealandResource Management Act 1991
At issue
Whether the Kāpiti Coast District Council lawfully and accurately communicated coastal hazard risks to property owners.

Documents

There are no documents to display yet. Check back later.

Summary

In February 2025, the Coastal Ratepayers Union (CRU) filed for a judicial review at the Wellington High Court regarding the Kāpiti Coast District Council’s (KCDC) public-facing information on coastal properties. The CRU alleged that the KCDC’s information on coastal properties, specifically hazard maps and Land Information Memorandums (LIMS), exaggerates climate risks such as sea level rise, floods, and erosion. Subsequently, the CRU requested that the council incorporate information from a report it had commissioned independently by retired Waikato University lecturer Willem de Lange into its report. The CRU contended that Lange’s report provided an alternative assessment of the risks of coastal hazards, which should also be made available to property owners. The KCDC has since agreed to include the CRU’s commissioned report, marking a shift in climate risk warning material.