Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database
Litigation

Delta Stewardship Council Cases

About this case

Documents

Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
06/08/2020
Decision
Order issued modifying opinion and denying petition for rehearing.
05/12/2020
Decision
Opinion of April 10, 2020 modified and certified for partial publication.
04/10/2020
Decision
Trial court judgments reversed to the extent the trial court concluded that the Council violated the Delta Reform Act by failing to adopt, as legally enforceable regulations, performance measure targets to achieve certain objectives of the Act and other claims dismissed as moot.
The California Court of Appeal reversed a trial court’s determination that the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Reform Act of 2009 required the Delta Stewardship Council to adopt performance measure targets as legally enforceable regulations in the long-term management plan for the Delta to achieve certain objectives of the Act. The court also agreed with the Council that other violations found by the trial court were moot due to the adoption in 2018 of amendments to the Delta Plan. In addition, the court affirmed the trial court’s rejection of certain other challenges to the Plan, including a claim that aspects of the Plan were not based on best available science. A climate change-related argument rejected by the trial court—that sea level rise projections in the Plan were too high and not based on best available science—did not appear to have been before the appellate court.

Summary

Challenge to long-term management plan for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta.