- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- California
- /
- Delta Stewardship Council Cases
Litigation
Delta Stewardship Council Cases
About this case
Documents
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
04/10/2020
Decision
Trial court judgments reversed to the extent the trial court concluded that the Council violated the Delta Reform Act by failing to adopt, as legally enforceable regulations, performance measure targets to achieve certain objectives of the Act and other claims dismissed as moot.
The California Court of Appeal reversed a trial court’s determination that the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Reform Act of 2009 required the Delta Stewardship Council to adopt performance measure targets as legally enforceable regulations in the long-term management plan for the Delta to achieve certain objectives of the Act. The court also agreed with the Council that other violations found by the trial court were moot due to the adoption in 2018 of amendments to the Delta Plan. In addition, the court affirmed the trial court’s rejection of certain other challenges to the Plan, including a claim that aspects of the Plan were not based on best available science. A climate change-related argument rejected by the trial court—that sea level rise projections in the Plan were too high and not based on best available science—did not appear to have been before the appellate court.
Summary
Challenge to long-term management plan for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta.