- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- Poland
- /
- Enea v. Former Board Members and D&O Insurers
Enea v. Former Board Members and D&O Insurers
About this case
Filing year
2023
Status
Pending
Geography
Court/admin entity
Poland → Regional Court in Poznań
Case category
Suits against corporations, individuals (Global) → Others (Global)
Principal law
Poland → Polish Commercial Companies Code
At issue
Whether Enea’s former board and supervisory board members breached their fiduciary duties—specifically, the duty of due diligence—by approving the Ostrołęka C coal power plant investment despite clear and documented financial and climate-related risks, and are they (and their D&O insurers) liable for the resulting financial losses
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Summary
In December 2023, Polish state-controlled energy company Enea filed a civil lawsuit against former board members and its directors and officers (D&O) liability insurers, seeking over PLN 656 million in damages over the failed Ostrołęka C coal-fired power plant project. The suit alleges that former board and supervisory board members breached their fiduciary duties by approving the high-risk coal investment in 2018, despite financial and climate-related warnings.
Enea’s decision to pursue the claim followed a 2021 audit by Poland’s Supreme Audit Office, which found failures in the company’s risk management and recommended accountability for the project’s losses. Shareholders formally approved the lawsuit in January 2024 with 87% support at an extraordinary general meeting.
The project had faced early opposition from minority shareholder ClientEarth, which initiated legal action in 2018 alleging the investment breached directors’ duties of due diligence. A 2019 court decision ruled the AGM resolution approving the plant invalid. The plant was eventually abandoned mid-construction in 2020, and Enea wrote off nearly PLN 1 billion.
The current lawsuit seeks to establish civil liability of both the individuals responsible for the decision and the insurers who provided cover under D&O policies. Legal commentators note that the case indirectly addresses directors’ duties in the context of climate-related financial risks, such as rising carbon prices, EU energy reforms, financing constraints, and competition from renewables.
This is one of the first climate-related damages actions against corporate board members in Poland and may have significant implications for corporate governance, fiduciary duty, and insurer liability in the context of the low-carbon transition.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Finance