- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- New York
- /
- Farm Sanctuary v. U.S. Department of Agriculture
Farm Sanctuary v. U.S. Department of Agriculture
Geography
Year
2019
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2019
Status
Motion to dismiss denied.
Geography
Docket number
6:19-cv-06910
Court/admin entity
United States → United States District Court for the Western District of New York (W.D.N.Y.)United States → United States Federal Courts
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US) → NEPA (US)Federal Statutory Claims (US) → Other Statutes and Regulations (US)
Principal law
United States → Administrative Procedure Act (APA)United States → Federal Meat Inspection ActUnited States → Humane Methods of Slaughter ActUnited States → National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
At issue
Lawsuit challenging the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s final rule establishing an optional new inspection system for hog slaughter establishments, including the failure to consider the rule's environmental impacts.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
06/28/2021
Motion to dismiss denied.
The federal district court for the Western District of New York denied a motion to dismiss a lawsuit challenging a U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) final rule establishing an optional new inspection system for hog slaughter establishments. The court concluded that the plaintiffs had sufficiently established standing at this stage of the litigation, including for their National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) claim, which asserted that USDA should not have relied on a categorical exclusion, including because “extraordinary circumstances” required preparation of an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement. The alleged extraordinary circumstances related to the potential adverse environmental effects, including “supply-level” effects such as the risk of climate change due to increases in emissions of the greenhouse gases methane and nitrous oxide at concentrated animal feeding operations.
Decision
02/18/2020
First amended complaint filed.
Complaint
12/18/2019
Complaint filed.
A lawsuit challenging the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA’s) final rule establishing an optional new inspection system for hog slaughter establishments included a claim that the USDA violated the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) by determining that the rule was categorically excluded from NEPA review. The complaint—filed by seven nonprofit organizations in the federal district court for the Western District of New York—asserted that even if the general terms of the USDA’s categorical exclusion for the actions of the Food Safety and Inspection Service could cover the rule, “extraordinary circumstances” existed that required preparation of an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement. Those circumstances related to the significant adverse environmental effects that the plaintiffs alleged would result from the increase in pig demand and slaughter numbers that the USDA projected in its economic benefits analysis. The plaintiffs alleged that the potential environmental effects included “supply-level” effects, including increasing the risk of climate change due to increases in emissions of the greenhouse gases methane and nitrous oxide at concentrated animal feeding operations.
Complaint
Summary
Lawsuit challenging the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s final rule establishing an optional new inspection system for hog slaughter establishments, including the failure to consider the rule's environmental impacts.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance