Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Greenpeace Indonesia and Others v. Bali Provincial Governor

Geography
Year
2018
Document Type
Litigation

About this case

Filing year
2018
Status
Decided
Court/admin entity
IndonesiaDenpasar Administrative Court
Case category
Suits against governments (Global)Environmental assessment and permitting (Global)Utilities (Global)
Principal law
IndonesiaLaw 32/2009 Environmental Protection and Management
At issue
Environmental permits granted to expand coal-fired power plant did not include a comprehensive analysis of climate change impacts
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
06/26/2018
Amicus Brief submitted by coalition of Indonesian and international environmental groups (English)
Complaint

Summary

Greenpeace Indonesia and three local residents of Buleleng District, Bali challenged the Bali Governor's granting of environmental permits for the expansion of the Celukan Bawang Coal-Fired Power Plant through Bali Governor's Decree No.660.3 / 3985 / IV-A / DISPMPT. Plaintiffs allege that the Bali Governor violated Environmental Law No.32 of 2009 and international commitments under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change by granting the environmental permits without consideration of the climate impacts of adding two 330 MW coal-fired units to the project. The Celukan Bawang Coal-Fired Power Plant Company is a defendant intervenor in the litigation. Nine Indonesian and international environmental groups filed an amici curiae brief in the proceeding before the Denpasar Administrative Court. They join the plaintiffs in asserting that the project does not comply with the Environmental Protection and Environmental Law No.32 of 2009 and undermines Indonesia’s international climate commitments because the Bali Governor did not conduct a comprehensive analysis of climate change impacts of the plant expansion. Greenpeace Indonesia and Others v. Bali Provincial Governor, 2 / G / LH / 2018 / PTUN.DPS (Denpasar Admin. Ct., filed Jan. 24, 2018; amici brief June 2018). In 2018, the Administrative Court rejected the lawsuit on procedural grounds. This decision was upheld by the Surabaya Administrative High Court (Case No. 221/B/LH/2018/PT.TUN.SBY), cassation appeal before the Indonesian Supreme Court (Case No. 224 K/TUN/LH/2019), and reconsideration application (peninjauan kembali) before the Indonesian Supreme Court (Case No. 67 PK/TUN/LH/2020). The final decision by the Supreme Court was to reaffirm the district court’s decision and ruled against the plaintiffs’ petition.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance