- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- HollyFrontier Cheyenne Refining, LLC v. Renewable Fuels Association
HollyFrontier Cheyenne Refining, LLC v. Renewable Fuels Association
Geography
Year
2018
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2018
Status
Tenth Circuit decision reversed and EPA granting of applications for extensions of exemptions upheld.
Geography
Docket number
20-472
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → U.S.
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US) → Clean Air Act (US) → Industry Lawsuits (US) → Renewable Fuel Standards (US)
Principal law
United States → Clean Air Act (CAA)United States → Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA)United States → Energy Policy Act of 2005
At issue
Challenge to EPA orders granting three petitions for extensions of small refinery exemptions from renewable fuel standards.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
06/25/2021
Tenth Circuit decision reversed and EPA granting of applications for extensions of exemptions upheld.
In a 6-3 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the Tenth Circuit and upheld “extension[s]” of exemptions from renewal fuel program requirements for three small refineries. EPA granted the extensions after a “lull” during which the refineries were not subject to exemptions. The Clean Air Act provision at issue authorizes small refineries to petition EPA “for an extension of the exemption … for the reason of disproportionate economic hardship.” The Court held that the provision used “extension” in its “temporal sense,” but that the statute did not impose a “continuity requirement” and instead allowed small refineries to apply for hardship extensions “at any time.” The Court therefore held that renewable fuel producers who challenged EPA’s approvals of the refineries’ extension requests had not shown that EPA acted in excess of its statutory authority. Justice Barrett dissented, joined by Justices Sotomayor and Kagan. In their view, the majority’s interpretation “caters to an outlier meaning of ‘extend’ and clashes with statutory structure.”
Decision
04/15/2021
Reply brief filed by petitioners.
Reply
03/31/2021
Brief amici curiae filed for Coalition for Renewable Natural Gas and Producers of Renewables United for Integrity Truth and Transparency in support of respondents.
Amicus Motion/Brief
03/31/2021
Brief filed by Growth Energy and American Farm Bureau Federation as amici curiae in support of respondents.
Amicus Motion/Brief
03/31/2021
Brief filed for National Biodiesel Board as amicus curiae in support of respondents.
Amicus Motion/Brief
03/31/2021
Brief filed by Iowa and seven other states as amici curiae supporting respondents.
Amicus Motion/Brief
03/31/2021
Brief filed by Advanced Biofuels Association as amicus curiae supporting respondents.
Amicus Motion/Brief
03/24/2021
Brief for the federal respondent filed.
Brief
03/24/2021
Brief of respondents filed.
Brief
03/01/2021
Amicus curiae brief filed by the American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers in support of petitioners.
Amicus Motion/Brief
03/01/2021
Brief filed by Small Refineries Association as amicus curiae supporting petitioners.
Amicus Motion/Brief
03/01/2021
Brief filed by Wyoming and six other states as amici curiae in support of petitioners.
Amicus Motion/Brief
02/26/2021
Brief filed by Countrymark Refining and Logistics, LLC as amicus curiae supporting petitioners.
Amicus Motion/Brief
02/22/2021
Brief of petitioners filed.
Brief
01/08/2021
Certiorari granted.
On January 8, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court granted a petition for writ of certiorari seeking review of a Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals decision that vacated U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) orders granting three petitions for extensions of small refinery exemptions from renewable fuel standards. The Tenth Circuit agreed with a coalition of renewable fuel producers that EPA exceeded its statutory authority granting extensions when none of the three small refineries had received an initial exemption in the years preceding their petitions for extension. The court also found that EPA improperly relied on hardship caused by factors other than compliance with renewable fuel obligations as a basis for granting the extensions. The petition for writ of certiorari raised the question of whether a small refinery must receive “uninterrupted, continuous hardship exemptions for every year since 2011” to qualify for a hardship exemption.
Decision
09/04/2020
Petition for writ of certiorari filed.
Petition For Writ Of Certiorari
Summary
Challenge to EPA orders granting three petitions for extensions of small refinery exemptions from renewable fuel standards.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance