- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- New Jersey
- /
- In re Proposed Construction of Compressor Station (CS327), Office Building & Appurtenant Structures, Highlands Applicability Determination, Program Interest No. 1615-17-0004.2 (APD200001)
In re Proposed Construction of Compressor Station (CS327), Office Building & Appurtenant Structures, Highlands Applicability Determination, Program Interest No. 1615-17-0004.2 (APD200001)
About this case
Filing year
2022
Status
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection's determination affirmed.
Geography
Docket number
A-3616-20
Court/admin entity
United States → State Courts → New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.)
Case category
State Law Claims (US) → Environmentalist Lawsuits (US)
Principal law
United States → New Jersey Administrative Procedure Act
At issue
Challenge to the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection's determinations authorizing Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company' s construction and operation of a compressor station and related facilities.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
06/27/2025
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection's determination affirmed.
On June 27, 2025, the New Jersey Appellate Division upheld the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection’s (NJDEP’s) determination that the construction and operation of Compressor Station 327 by Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company was consistent with the goals of the Highlands Water Protection and Planning Act.
Environmental groups—Food & Water Watch, New Jersey Highlands Coalition, and Sierra Club—challenged the project’s approval on multiple grounds, including greenhouse gas emissions and water quality impacts. However, the court found that NJDEP reasonably excluded climate change concerns like off-site GHG emissions and downstream air quality effects from the Highlands Act review. The court reasoned that they were outside NJDEP’s statutory mandate because the emissions would occur outside the Highlands region, there was no showing of direct impact on the Highlands region, and the issue had already been reviewed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
The court also rejected the claim that the project would induce sprawl or increase climate-related water quality risks in the Highlands region, noting that the compressor station served out-of-state demand and did not increase local gas delivery. The court also upheld NJDEP’s finding that the project was consistent with the Water Quality Management Plan because of low projected water use and wastewater discharge.
Ultimately, the court concluded that the appellants’ broader climate concerns fell outside the scope of a Highlands Applicability Determination and affirmed NJDEP’s decision.
Decision
–
Summary
Challenge to the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection's determinations authorizing Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company' s construction and operation of a compressor station and related facilities.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Risk
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance