Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database
Litigation

Maine Lobstermen’s Association v. National Marine Fisheries Service

About this case

Documents

Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
06/16/2023
Decision
District court's grant of summary judgment to NMFS reversed and district court directed to enter summary judgment for the lobstermen on two counts and to vacate the biological opinion as applied to the lobster and Jonah crab fisheries and to remand the phase one rule to NMFS.
In an appeal by lobstermen and the State of Maine, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the federal district court for the District of Columbia and vacated a biological opinion as it applied to the lobster and Jonah crab fisheries. The appellate court also remanded a rule establishing a conservation framework intended to protect the endangered North Atlantic right whale. The reversal was based on the D.C. Circuit’s holding that the Endangered Species Act did not permit the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) to “give the ‘benefit of the doubt’ to an endangered species by relying upon worst-case scenarios or pessimistic assumptions” when faced with uncertainty. The appellate court did not address the issue raised in the district court of whether NMFS adequately considered evidence that right whales were increasingly spending more time in Canadian waters due to climate change.
01/24/2023
Motion To Dismiss
Defendants filed motion to dismiss appeal as moot.

Summary

Challenge by lobstering associations, a lobstering union, and Maine to the biological opinion for federal lobster fisheries as too restrictive.