Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database
Litigation

Mayor & City Council of Baltimore v. BP p.l.c.

About this case

Documents

Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
07/10/2024
Decision
Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim granted.
A Maryland Circuit Court granted fossil fuel companies’ motion to dismiss the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore’s claims seeking to hold the companies liable for climate change-related injuries resulting from the companies’ alleged “sophisticated campaign of deception to misrepresent and conceal their products’ risks.” Aligning itself with the reasoning of decisions that held that New York City’s and Delaware’s claims against fossil fuel companies were preempted or largely preempted, the Maryland court rejected Baltimore’s contention that its lawsuit did not seek to regulate or impose liability for greenhouse gas emissions. The court found “that Baltimore’s complaint is entirely about addressing the injuries of global climate change and seeking damages for such alleged injuries” and that Baltimore’s explanation “that it only seeks to address and hold Defendants accountable for a deceptive misinformation campaign is simply a way to get in the back door what they cannot get in the front door.” The Maryland court concluded that federal common law applied because the case involved global emissions, that the Clean Air Act displaced federal common law related to domestic emissions, and that the Clean Air Act preempted Baltimore’s state law claims based on domestic emissions. The Maryland court further concluded that state law could not provide a remedy for claims arising from foreign emissions. The court distinguished the Fourth Circuit’s decision that the companies’ preemption defense did not create federal jurisdiction over Baltimore’s claims, citing “the heightened standard unique to the removability inquiry.” Although the Maryland court dismissed Baltimore’s claims on preemption grounds, the court also concluded—“to make the record complete”—that Baltimore failed to state claims of public and private nuisance, failure to warn, design defect, and trespass. The court also ruled that Baltimore’s Maryland Consumer Protection Act claim was time-barred.
01/26/2024
Reply
Reply filed in further support of BP p.l.c., BP America Inc., and BP Products North America Inc.'s individual motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
01/26/2024
Reply
Reply filed by Chevron defendants in support of motion to dismiss complaint under Maryland's anti-SLAPP law.
01/26/2024
Reply
Reply memorandum filed in support of Chevron defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
01/26/2024
Reply
Reply filed by defendant CITGO Petroleum Corporation in support of its motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
01/26/2024
Reply
Reply filed by CNX Resources Corporation in support of its individual motion for failure to state a claim.
01/26/2024
Reply
Reply filed by CNX Resources Corporation in support of its individual motion for lack of personal jurisdiction.
01/26/2024
Reply
Reply memorandum filed in support of ConocoPhillips, ConocoPhillips Company, and Louisiana Land & Exploration Co., LLC's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
01/26/2024
Reply
Reply filed by CONSOL Energy Inc. and CONSOL Marine Terminals LLC in support of supplemental motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction.
01/26/2024
Reply
Reply filed by CONSOL Energy Inc. and CONSOL Marine Terminals LLC in support of supplemental motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
01/26/2024
Reply
Reply filed by Crown defendants in support of their individual motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
01/26/2024
Reply
Joint reply brief filed in support of certain defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction.
01/26/2024
Reply
Reply memorandum filed in support of defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
01/26/2024
Reply
Reply filed in further support of ExxonMobil's supplemental motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
01/26/2024
Reply
Reply filed by defendant Hess in support of its supplemental motion to partially dismiss plaintiff's complaint for failure to state a claim on statute of limitations grounds.
01/26/2024
Reply
Reply memorandum filed by Marathon Petroleum Corporation and Speedway LLC in support of motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
01/26/2024
Reply
Reply filed by Marathon Oil Corporation and Marathon Oil Company in support of supplemental motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
01/26/2024
Reply
Reply filed by Shell plc and Shell USA, Inc. in support of individual motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
01/26/2024
Reply
Reply filed by defendants Phillips 66 or Phillips 66 Company in support of individual motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
01/12/2024
Opposition
Memorandum of law filed by Mayor and City Council of Baltimore in opposition to defendant CITGO Petroleum Corporation's memorandum of law in support of defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
12/22/2023
Amicus Motion/Brief
Motion filed by the Attorney General of Maryland for leave to file amicus curiae brief in opposition to the defendants' joint motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
12/12/2023
Opposition
Memorandum of law filed by Mayor and City Council of Baltimore in opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
12/12/2023
Opposition
Memorandum of law filed by Mayor and City Council of Baltimore in opposition to certain defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction.
12/12/2023
Opposition
Memorandum of law filed by Mayor and City Council of Baltimore in opposition to Chevron defendants' motion to dismiss under Maryland's anti-SLAPP law.
12/12/2023
Opposition
Memorandum of law filed by Mayor and City Council of Baltimore in opposition to BP p.l.c., BP America Inc., and BP Products North America Inc.'s individual motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
12/12/2023
Opposition
Memorandum of law filed by Mayor and City Council of Baltimore in opposition to Crown Central LLC and Crown Central New Holdings, LLC's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
12/12/2023
Opposition
Memorandum of law filed by Mayor and City Council of Baltimore in opposition to ConocoPhillips, ConocoPhillips Company, and Louisiana Land & Exploration Co., LLC supplemental motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
12/12/2023
Opposition
Memorandum of law filed by Mayor and City Council of Baltimore in opposition to CONSOL Energy Inc. and CONSOL Marine Terminals LLC's supplemental motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
12/12/2023
Opposition
Memorandum of law filed by Mayor and City Council of Baltimore in opposition to Chevron defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
12/12/2023
Opposition
Memorandum of law filed by Mayor and City Council of Baltimore in opposition to CNX Resources Corporation's individual motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
12/12/2023
Opposition
Memorandum of law filed by Mayor and City Council of Baltimore in opposition to Exxon Mobil Corporation's supplemental memorandum of law in support of defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
12/12/2023
Opposition
Memorandum of law filed by Mayor and City Council of Baltimore in opposition to Phillips 66 and Phillips 66 Company's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
12/12/2023
Opposition
Memorandum of law filed by Mayor and City Council of Baltimore in opposition to Marathon Petroleum Corporation and Speedway, LLC's memorandum of law in support of the motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
12/12/2023
Opposition
Memorandum of law filed by Mayor and City Council of Baltimore in opposition to Shell plc and Shell USA, Inc.'s individual motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
12/12/2023
Opposition
Memorandum of law filed by Mayor and City Council of Baltimore in opposition to Marathon Oil Corporation and Marathon Oil Company's supplemental motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
12/12/2023
Opposition
Memorandum of law filed by Mayor and City Council of Baltimore in opposition to Hess Corporation's supplemental motion to partially dismiss for failure to state a claim.
12/12/2023
Opposition
Memorandum of law filed by Mayor and City Council of Baltimore in opposition to CNX Resources Corporation's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction.
12/12/2023
Opposition
Memorandum of law filed by Mayor and City Council of Baltimore in opposition to CONSOL Energy Inc. and CONSOL Marine Terminals LLC's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction.
10/16/2023
Motion To Dismiss
Motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction filed by certain defendants.
10/16/2023
Motion To Dismiss
Motion to dismiss under Maryland's anti-SLAPP law filed by Chevron defendants.
10/16/2023
Motion To Dismiss
Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim filed by defendants.
10/16/2023
Motion To Dismiss
Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim filed by Chevron Corporation.
10/16/2023
Motion To Dismiss
Supplemental memorandum of law filed by Exxon Mobil Corporation in support of defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
10/16/2023
Motion To Dismiss
Individual motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim filed by CNX Resources Corporation.
10/16/2023
Motion To Dismiss
Individual motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim filed by Phillips 66 and Phillips 66 Company.
10/16/2023
Motion To Dismiss
Memorandum of law filed by Marathon Petroleum Corporation and Speedway LLC in support of motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
10/16/2023
Motion To Dismiss
Memorandum of law filed by CONSOL Energy Inc. and CONSOL Marine Terminals LLC in support of their supplemental motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
10/16/2023
Motion To Dismiss
Individual motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction filed by CNX Resources Corporation.
10/16/2023
Motion To Dismiss
Memorandum of law filed by CONSOL Energy Inc. and CONSOL Marine Terminals LLC in support of their supplemental motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction.
10/16/2023
Motion To Dismiss
Individual motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim filed by Shell plc and Shell USA, Inc.
10/16/2023
Motion To Dismiss
Supplemental motion for failure to state a claim filed by Marathon Oil Corporation and Marathon Oil Company.
10/16/2023
Motion To Dismiss
Supplemental motion filed by Hess Corporation to partially dismiss plaintiff's complaint for failure to state a claim on statute of limitations grounds.
10/16/2023
Motion To Dismiss
Memorandum of law filed by CITGO Petroleum Corporation in support of defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
10/16/2023
Motion To Dismiss
Memorandum of law filed by BP p.l.c., BP America Inc., and BP Products North America Inc. in support of individual motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
10/16/2023
Motion To Dismiss
Memorandum filed by Crown Central LLC and Crown Central New Holdings LLC in support of defendant-specific motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
10/16/2023
Motion To Dismiss
Supplemental motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim filed by ConocoPhillips, ConocoPhillips Company, and Louisiana Land & Exploration Co., LLC.
08/05/2020
Letter
Letter filed by Chevron Corporation in response to the plaintiff's letter of July 29, 2020 regarding decision in United States v. California.
07/29/2020
Letter
Letter filed by the plaintiff regarding the Eastern District of California's decision in United States v. California.
07/13/2020
Letter
Letter filed by the plaintiff in response to the defendants' letter of July 8, 2020.
07/08/2020
Letter
Letter filed by defendants in response to the court's notice of July 1, 2020.
07/07/2020
Letter
Letter filed by Chevron Corporation in response to the plaintiff's letter concerning the Ninth Circuit's decision in City of Oakland v. BP p.l.c.
07/02/2020
Letter
Letter filed by plaintiff in response to the court's notice of July 1, 2020.
07/01/2020
Notice
Notice issued by court indicating withdrawal of dates proposed for hearing on motion to dismiss.
06/11/2020
Letter
Letter submitted by plaintiff regarding Ninth Circuit's decision in City of Oakland v. BP p.l.c.
05/21/2020
Reply
Reply memorandum filed in support of defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
04/23/2020
Amicus Motion/Brief
Brief filed by amicus curiae Attorney General of Maryland in opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
04/07/2020
Amicus Motion/Brief
Brief filed by former U.S. government officials as amici curiae in support of plaintiff's opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss.
03/20/2020
Amicus Motion/Brief
Motion by United States to file a brief as amicus curiae in support of the defendants' motion to dismiss.
03/15/2020
Opposition
Opposition filed by the plaintiff to defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
02/07/2020
Motion To Dismiss
Joint motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction filed by defendants.
02/07/2020
Stipulation
Parties filed joint stipulation for limited amendment of joint stipulation regarding preliminary motions.
02/07/2020
Decision
Supplemental memorandum filed in support of CNX/Consol motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction.
02/07/2020
Motion To Dismiss
Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted filed by defendants.
02/07/2020
Request
Request for judicial notice filed by defendants' in support of their joint motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction.
07/20/2018
Complaint
Complaint filed.
On July 20, 2018, the Mayor and City of Baltimore (Baltimore) filed an action in Maryland state court seeking to hold 26 fossil fuel companies liable for injuries resulting from climate change. Like other municipalities, Baltimore alleged that the defendants’ conduct—the production, promotion, and marketing of fossil fuel products; the simultaneous concealment of the products’ known hazards; and their “championing of anti-science campaigns”—directly and proximately cause adverse climate change impacts. The alleged injuries included more frequent and more severe storms and flooding in the city and substantial increases in average sea level, as well as heatwaves, disruptions of the hydrologic cycle (including extreme precipitation and drought), and associated public health impacts. Baltimore asserted that it was particularly vulnerable to sea level rise and flooding due to 60 miles of waterfront land and that climate change impacts already adversely affected the City’s infrastructure. Baltimore asserted causes of action for public nuisance, private nuisance, strict liability failure to warn, strict liability design defect, negligent design defect, negligent failure to warn, and trespass, as well as a cause of action under Maryland’s Consumer Protection Act.

Summary

City of Baltimore lawsuit seeking to hold fossil fuel companies liable for climate change impacts.