Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Meeting House Way, LLC v. Martha’s Vineyard Commission

About this case

Filing year
2020
Status
Martha's Vineyard Commission's decision affirmed.
Docket number
2020-33
Court/admin entity
United StatesState CourtsMassachusetts Superior Court(Mass. Super. Ct.)
Case category
State Law Claims (US)Other Types of State Law Cases (US)
Principal law
United States
At issue
Challenge to denial of proposal for a residential project at a 54.26-acre site that included 28 single-family house lots and 14 affordable townhouses and was largest residential development considered by the Martha's Vineyard Commission in a decade.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
Search results
04/20/2023
Martha's Vineyard Commission's decision affirmed.
A Massachusetts Superior Court upheld the Martha’s Vineyard Commission’s denial of a proposal for a residential project at a 54.26-acre site. The project included 28 single-family house lots and 14 affordable townhouses and was the largest residential development considered by the Commission in at least a decade. The Commission found that criteria for project approval under the law governing the Commission were not met, including the criterion that “the probable benefit from the proposed development will exceed the probable detriment” based on an evaluation of eight factors. Regarding one of those factors, “impact upon the environment,” the Commission found an overall detrimental impact, including because the project would contribute to greenhouse gas emissions through use of “considerable amounts of propane” even though it also would include on-site renewable energy generation. The court found that to the extent the conclusion regarding a detrimental effect on the environment was based on use of propane, it was “contrary to the parties’ stipulation that energy was not a factor” in the denial of approval. The court found, however, that other findings by the Commission of detrimental impacts to the environment were supported. The court also found that evidence supported the Commission’s central conclusions that the project was an inappropriate form of development because it “would commit significant acreage towards luxury homes in a suburban setting, which would not be a prudent use of the island’s dwindling supply of remaining developable land.”
Decision

Summary

Challenge to denial of proposal for a residential project at a 54.26-acre site that included 28 single-family house lots and 14 affordable townhouses and was largest residential development considered by the Martha's Vineyard Commission in a decade.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance