- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States of America
- /
- New York
- /
- Neighbors for a Better Micron v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Neighbors for a Better Micron v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Geography
Year
2026
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2026
Status
Verified petition filed.
Geography
Docket number
909009-26
Court/admin entity
United States → State Courts → New York Supreme Court (N.Y. Sup. Ct.)
Case category
State Law Claims (US) → Other Types of State Law Cases (US)
Principal law
United States → Clean Air Act (CAA)United States → Clean Water Act (CWA)United States → State Law—Miscellaneous Statutes → New York Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act
At issue
Document with title of Neighbors for a Better Micron v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
07/31/2026
Lawsuit Challenged Semiconductor Manufacturing Project Permits’ Compliance with New York Climate Law
Verified petition filed.
A lawsuit filed in New York Supreme Court challenged the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation’s (NYSDEC’s) issuance of air and water permits for components of a semiconductor manufacturing project in Onondaga County. An earlier lawsuit challenging the Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency’s State Environmental Quality Review Act determinations is also pending in New York Supreme Court. The petitioners challenging the permits asserted that NYSDEC’s issuance of a Clean Air Act Title V permit for the project failed to satisfy the requirements of Section 7(2) of the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act (CLCPA) because NYSDEC’s justifications for the permit did not identify “real, quantifiable, permanent, verifiable, and enforceable” mitigation measures and instead “rely only on funding for unidentified future projects, without established selection criteria, quantified emissions reductions, or any assurance that the funded projects will mitigate the Project’s [greenhouse gas] emissions.” DEC also asserted that issuance of the Title V permit was arbitrary and capricious for failing to adequately evaluate and control emissions, including by failing to resolve issues regarding potential sulfur hexafluoride emissions. The petitioners also asserted that NYSDEC’s CLCPA Section 7(2) determination for the water discharge permit failed to identify enforceable mitigation and instead required Onondaga County to prepare a future CLCPA mitigation plan. The petition also asserted failures to address air emissions and water discharges of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances.
Petition
Summary
Challenge to permits for semiconductor manufacturing project in Onondaga County, New York.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Just transition
Renewable energy
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance