- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- New York
- /
- Neighbors for a True Oasis v. Village of Port Washington North
Neighbors for a True Oasis v. Village of Port Washington North
Geography
Year
2024
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2024
Status
Petitioners directed to add applicant as necessary party and determination on substantive claims held in abeyance.
Geography
Docket number
609509/2024
Court/admin entity
United States → State Courts → New York Supreme Court (N.Y. Sup. Ct.)
Case category
Public Trust Claims (US)State Law Claims (US) → State Impact Assessment Laws (US)
Principal law
United States → New York Constitution-Environmental Rights AmendmentUnited States → New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA)United States → Public Trust Doctrine
At issue
Challenge to a New York village's plan to sell a 7.45-acre forested area for development of 44 townhomes.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
03/14/2025
Petitioners directed to add applicant as necessary party and determination on substantive claims held in abeyance.
Decision
05/31/2024
Verified petition and complaint filed.
A lawsuit filed in the New York Supreme Court challenged a plan by a village on Long Island, New York to sell a 7.45-acre forested area for development of 44 townhomes. The petitioners alleged that the area had been dedicated for use as permanent open space in connection with an earlier development project. The petitioners asserted that the village respondents violated the New York State Constitution’s Environmental Rights Amendment, SEQRA, and the public trust doctrine. The SEQRA cause of action included allegations that the village planning board did not consider adverse impacts of greenhouse gas emissions or the “the creation of ‘heat islands’ through the extensive paving” of the site. The petitioners also asked the court to impose a constructive trust over the area.
Petition
Summary
Challenge to a New York village's plan to sell a 7.45-acre forested area for development of 44 townhomes.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Finance