- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Massachusetts
- /
- New England Power Generators Association v. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
New England Power Generators Association v. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Geography
Year
2017
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2017
Status
Motion for judgment on the pleadings filed by plaintiffs.
Geography
Docket number
17-02918-D
Court/admin entity
United States → State Courts → Massachusetts Superior Court(Mass. Super. Ct.)
Case category
State Law Claims (US) → Industry Lawsuits (US)
Principal law
United States → Massachusetts Global Warming Solutions Act
At issue
Challenge to Massachusetts regulations establishing emissions limits for electricity generating facilities.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
01/16/2018
Motion for judgment on the pleadings filed by plaintiffs.
On January 16, 2018, New England Power Generators Association (NEPGA) and GenOn Energy, Inc. (GenOn) moved for judgment on the pleadings in their action challenging regulations adopted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection and the Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs that imposed greenhouse gas emissions reductions requirements on electricity generating facilities and other sources. NEPGA is a trade association representing competitive power generators; GenOn owns power plants in Massachusetts. NEPGA and GenOn argued that the regulations were beyond the agencies’ authority because they were inconsistent with the Global Warming Solutions Act (GWSA), which NEPGA and GenOn said circumscribed the agencies’ authority to regulate electric sector greenhouse gas emissions by requiring that regulations take the regional electricity market into account. NEPGA also contended that the GWSA barred the agencies from imposing emissions limitations that extended beyond the statute’s sunset date in 2020. In addition, NEPGA and GenOn argued that the regulations were arbitrary and capricious because “[t]hey would have the perverse impact of causing an increase in statewide greenhouse gas emissions” due to the importing of electricity from less efficient power plants outside of Massachusetts—the plaintiffs said the only modeling in the record demonstrated that this increase would occur.
Motion
09/11/2017
Complaint
Summary
Challenge to Massachusetts regulations establishing emissions limits for electricity generating facilities.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Finance