- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- New York
- /
- People v. JBS USA Food Co.
About this case
Documents
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
01/10/2025
Decision
Motion to dismiss granted without prejudice to the extent of granting the Attorney General leave to file an amended complaint.
The New York Supreme Court granted a motion by the beef producer companies JBS USA Food Company and JBS USA Food Company Holdings (JBS USA) to dismiss the New York State Attorney General’s climate washing action to the extent of granting the Attorney General leave to file an amended complaint. The Attorney General alleged that JBS USA violated the New York General Business Law by making misleading and unsubstantiated claims regarding its commitment to climate goals, including achievement of net zero emissions by 2040. From the bench, the court granted the Attorney General 90 days to file an amended complaint that would, among other things, “articulate … more clearly” the basis for subjecting JBS USA to jurisdiction in New York. The court also suggested during oral argument that the complaint needed “a clearer statement of how the statute was violated” even after JBS USA changed its language to refer to “ambition to achieve” net zero rather than “commitment to achieve.”
02/28/2024
Complaint
Complaint filed.
New York State Attorney General Letitia James filed a complaint in New York Supreme Court against JBS USA Food Company and JBS USA Food Company Holdings (JBS USA) alleging that the defendants—the “largest producer of beef products in the world”—made unsubstantiated and misleading environmental marketing claims about their commitment to reducing greenhouse gas emissions in violation of New York State’s consumer protection statutes. The complaint alleged that beef production contributes significantly to climate change through emissions of greenhouse gases and through land-use changes that reduce or eliminate carbon sinks, and that the top five meat and dairy corporations are responsible for more annual greenhouse gas emissions than ExxonMobil, Shell, or BP, individually, with JBS USA and its parents, subsidiaries, and affiliates (the JBS Group) being the top contributor. The complaint alleged that JBS USA knows that demand for its products will decrease if consumers view them as unsustainable and harmful to the environment and that the JBS Group had directed representations regarding its sustainability to New York consumers, including representations regarding the “Net Zero by 2040” commitment it made in 2021. New York alleged that self-regulating advertising industry groups had found this claim to be misleading. New York also contended that the JBS Group’s greenhouse gas emissions calculations have not accounted for Scope 3 emissions resulting from Amazon deforestation and other land use changes in its supply chain and that the Net Zero by 2040 commitment also was misleading based on the JBS Group’s plans to increase demand for its products. The complaint requested that the court enjoin JBS USA from violating the consumer protection statutes; order the defendants to disgorge profits traceable to these violations; grant civil penalties; perform independent audits of consumer-facing publications; and pay the State’s costs and attorneys’ fees.
Summary
New York State attorney general's greenwashing lawsuit against beef producer for allegedly making unsubstantiated claims regarding its "Net Zero by 2040" commitment.