Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

R v. Bramwell et al (“The Shell Six case”)

Geography
Year
2021
Document Type
Litigation

About this case

Filing year
2021
Status
Decided
Court/admin entity
United KingdomEngland and WalesCrown CourtsSouthwark Crown Court
Case category
Suits against corporations, individuals (Global)Protesters (Global)
Principal law
United KingdomCriminal CodeUnited KingdomCriminal Damage Act 1971
At issue
Whether extinction rebellion protestors who caused damage to Shell's headquarters to protest the environmental damage caused by the company should be convicted of criminal damage.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
04/23/2021
Defendant - Jane Augsburger Closing Statement
Other
04/23/2021
Defendant - Senan Clifford's Closing Statement
Other
04/23/2021
Defendant -David Lambert closing statement
Other
04/23/2021
Defendant - Bramwell, Simon Closing Statement
Other

Summary

On April 23, 2021, a jury at Southwark Crown Court acquitted six protestors who were charged with criminal damage caused to Shell's headquarters after spray painting slogans and breaking windows during the course of Extinction Rebellion protests in April 2019. According to an Extinction Rebellion press release, a seventh protestor who had pleaded guilty due to child care arrangements was subsequently given a conditional discharge. According to media reports, the judge allowed defendants to provide evidence of their motivations but informed the jury that even if they were "morally justified" they had no defence at law. The jury nonetheless decided to acquit the activists after reportedly asking to see a copy of their oath.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance