- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- New York
- /
- Save the Pine Bush, Inc. v. Town of Guilderland
Save the Pine Bush, Inc. v. Town of Guilderland
Geography
Year
2020
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2020
Status
Dismissal affirmed.
Geography
Docket number
534176
Court/admin entity
United States → State Courts → New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division (N.Y. App. Div.)
Case category
State Law Claims (US) → Environmentalist Lawsuits (US)State Law Claims (US) → State Impact Assessment Laws (US)
Principal law
United States → New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA)
At issue
Challenge to environmental review of a plan to develop commercial space (including a Costco) and apartments.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
05/05/2022
Dismissal affirmed.
The New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, upheld the State Environmental Quality Review Act review of a plan to develop commercial space (including a Costco) and apartments in the Town of Guilderland. The court found that the Town Planning Board “took the requisite hard look at the potential environmental impacts of concern to petitioner and offered thorough explanations for its determination.” The court was not persuaded by the petitioner’s arguments, including climate change-related arguments. With respect to climate change, the court found that the Planning Board’s review “thoroughly assessed” the project’s air quality impacts and noted the Board’s finding that potential development was “too limited in scope to have a significant impact on global climate change,” that the project’s accessibility by existing roadways and public transit made it “consistent with land use planning aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions,” and that “a net reduction in emissions was possible in view of the fact that apartment dwellers at the project could walk or rely more upon public transit given the project’s location, and that Costco patrons, who presently travel 87 miles to the nearest Costco, would drive less if a local Costco were built.”
Decision
Summary
Challenge to environmental review of a plan to develop commercial space (including a Costco) and apartments.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance