Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Sierra Club, Iowa Chapter v. LaHood

Geography
Year
2011
Document Type
Litigation
Part of

About this case

Filing year
2011
Status
Order issued granting defendants' motion for summary judgment.
Docket number
4:11-cv-00258
Court/admin entity
United StatesUnited States Federal CourtsUnited States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa (S.D. Iowa)
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US)NEPA (US)
Principal law
United StatesNational Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
At issue
Challenge to highway extension.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
06/10/2013
Order issued granting defendants' motion for summary judgment.
The court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment, finding that the agencies had not acted arbitrarily and capriciously in approving an 8.5-mile highway extension southwest of Cedar Rapids, Iowa.  The court was not persuaded by plaintiffs’ arguments that under the Eighth Circuit’s decision in Mid States Coalition for Progress v. Surface Transportation Board, 345 F.3d 520 (8th Cir. 2003), climate change must be considered in an environmental review under NEPA.  Finding that Mid States Coalition for Progress required consideration of impacts on air quality more generally—not climate change specifically—the district court ruled that “there is no requirement that climate change be analyzed, particularly given the speculative nature of such an effect.
Decision

Summary

Challenge to highway extension.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Impacted group
Fossil fuel
Economic sector
Finance