Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

United States v. U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon

Geography
Date
2015
Document type
Litigation
Part of

About this cases

Filing year
2015
Status
Application for stay denied.
Docket number
18A65
Court/admin entity
United StatesUnited States Federal CourtsU.S.
Case category
Constitutional ClaimsFifth AmendmentPublic Trust Claims
Principal law
United StatesFifth Amendment—Due ProcessUnited StatesFifth Amendment—Equal ProtectionUnited StatesNinth AmendmentUnited StatesPublic Trust Doctrine
At issue
Action by young plaintiffs asserting that the federal government violated their constitutional rights by causing dangerous carbon dioxide concentrations. [Due to a technical issue, some documents are currently not available.]

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
07/30/2018
Application for stay denied.
On July 30, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court denied the federal government’s application for a stay of the young people’s climate change lawsuit pending in the federal district court for the District of Oregon, which is scheduled for trial beginning on October 29, 2018. The Supreme Court’s order denying the stay application said the request for relief was premature and denied the request without prejudice. The Court also noted that “[t]he breadth of respondents’ claims is striking, however, and the justiciability of those claims presents substantial grounds for difference of opinion.” The Court said the district court “should take these concerns into account in assessing the burdens of discovery and trial, as well as the desirability of a prompt ruling on the Government’s pending dispositive motions.”
Decision
07/23/2018
Response brief filed by respondents Juliana et al.
Response
07/20/2018
Letter filed by Solicitor General.
After the Ninth Circuit denied the government’s second mandamus petition on July 20, the federal government indicated in a letter to the Supreme Court that the alternative course of action of construing its stay application as a petition for writ of certiorari or mandamus was “even more warranted” because “nothing relevant remains to be done in the lower courts.”
Letter
07/17/2018
Application filed for a stay pending disposition by the Ninth Circuit of the petition for writ of mandamus and any further proceedings in the Supreme Court; U.S. also requested administrative stay.
The federal government filed a stay application in the Supreme Court after the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied the government’s emergency motion for a stay pending consideration of a second petition for a writ of mandamus filed by the government on July 5, 2018. The federal government asked the Supreme Court for a stay pending the Ninth Circuit’s consideration of the mandamus petition and any further proceedings in the Supreme Court, and also requested an administrative stay pending the Court’s ruling on the stay application. Alternatively, the federal government suggested that the Supreme Court could construe its application as a petition for writ of mandamus or petition for writ of certiorari from the Ninth Circuit’s March 2018 decision denying mandamus and directly order dismissal of the action or a stay pending the resolution of the federal government’s pending dispositive motions.
Application

Summary

Action by young plaintiffs asserting that the federal government violated their constitutional rights by causing dangerous carbon dioxide concentrations. [Due to a technical issue, some documents are currently not available.]