Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database
Litigation

United States v. Vermont

Date
2025
Geography

About this case

Documents

Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
09/15/2025
Motion For Summary Judgment
United States and EPA filed consolidated response in opposition to motions to dismiss and memorandum in support of motion for summary judgment.
08/26/2025
Amicus Motion/Brief
Brief filed by economists Joseph E. Stiglitz et al. as amici curiae.
08/22/2025
Motion To Dismiss
Memorandum of law filed in support of intervenor-defendants' motion to dismiss.
08/15/2025
Motion To Dismiss
Memorandum of law filed in support of defendants' motion to dismiss.
08/08/2025
Decision
Northeast Organic Farming Association of Vermont and Conservation Law Foundation's motion to intervene granted.
07/29/2025
Reply
Reply memorandum filed by Northeast Organic Farming Association of Vermont and Conservation Law Foundation in support of motion to intervene.
07/23/2025
Opposition
Response filed by plaintiffs in opposition to motion to intervene.
07/09/2025
Motion To Intervene
Motion to intervene filed by Northeast Organic Farming Association of Vermont and Conservation Law Foundation.
06/25/2025
Motion
Stipulated motion filed to set briefing schedule.
The parties proposed a briefing schedule that would coordinate the briefing for this case with the <a href="https://climatecasechart.com/case/chamber-of-commerce-of-the-united-states-of-america-v-moore/">case</a> filed by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and American Petroleum Institute.
05/01/2025
Complaint
Complaint filed.
On May 1, 2025, the Trump administration filed a lawsuit against the State of Vermont asserting that the State's climate Superfund law is unconstitutional and unenforceable. The complaint alleged that the law, which the State enacted in 2024, is a “transparent monetary-extraction scheme” to force out-of-state fossil fuel companies to fund climate change adaptation projects within the state. The complaint alleged that the law attempts “to usurp the power of the federal government by regulating national and global emissions of greenhouse gases, violating federal law in multiple ways.” The United States alleged that the climate Superfund law is preempted by the Clean Air Act and foreign affairs doctrine, that it violates the limits on extraterritorial legislation imposed by the Constitution’s structure and due process principles, and that the law violates the Foreign and Interstate Commerce Clauses. The United States asked the court to declare the law unconstitutional and unenforceable and to enjoin the State defendants from taking actions to implement or enforce the law. The United States filed a <a href="https://climatecasechart.com/case/united-states-v-new-york/">similar lawsuit</a> challenging New York's climate Superfund law. There also is a <a href="https://climatecasechart.com/case/chamber-of-commerce-of-the-united-states-of-america-v-moore/">pending case</a> in which the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and American Petroleum Institute challenge the Vermont law.

Summary

Action brought by the United States asserting that Vermont's Climate Superfund Act is unconstitutional and unenforceable.