- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Colorado
- /
- University Corporation for Atmospheric Research v. National Science Foundation
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research v. National Science Foundation
Geography
Year
2026
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2026
Status
Motion for preliminary injunction filed.
Geography
Docket number
1:26-cv-01061
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States District Court for the District of Colorado (D. Colo.)
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US) → Other Statutes and Regulations (US)Constitutional Claims (US) → First Amendment (US)
Principal law
United States → Administrative Procedure Act (APA)United States → First Amendment
At issue
Lawsuit alleging that federal agencies' "dismantling" of the National Center for Atmospheric Research constituted unlawful retaliation.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
04/03/2026
Motion for preliminary injunction filed.
UCAR filed a motion for a preliminary injunction to enjoin the defendants from divesting UCAR or NCAR of rights, resources, or responsibilities related to NWSC.
Motion
03/16/2026
Complaint filed.
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (UCAR), the nonprofit research consortium that manages the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), filed a lawsuit in the federal district court for the District of Colorado challenging actions taken by the National Science Foundation, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the U.S. Department of Commerce, the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and individual officials that UCAR alleged are intended to dismantle NCAR, which the complaint described as “a cornerstone of the country’s atmospheric and Earth systems research infrastructure.” The complaint alleged that UCAR and NCAR, headquartered in Boulder, were “collateral damage” in “the federal government’s campaign of retribution” against the State of Colorado for refusing to relinquish its sovereign authority over regulating elections and administering and enforcing its criminal code. The complaint alleged retaliatory measures that included divesting UCAR of its stewardship of the NCAR-Wyoming Supercomputing Center (NWSC), termination of a cooperative agreement between NOAA and UCAR to fund climate adaptation and mitigation research, saddling UCAR and NCAR with “disparate and undue reporting requirements,” imposition of gag orders on UCAR and NCAR officials, and plotting steps with private entities “to strip UCAR and NCAR of their resources, rights, and responsibilities.” The complaint asserted that the defendants’ actions violated the Administrative Procedure Act and the Constitution. UCAR alleged that the defendants’ actions posed “a direct threat to America’s national, economic, and public-health security and risks derailing the United States’ global leadership in atmospheric research, weather forecasting, and supercomputing.”
Complaint
Summary
Lawsuit alleging that federal agencies' "dismantling" of the National Center for Atmospheric Research constituted unlawful retaliation.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Fossil fuel
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance