- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- District of Columbia
- /
- Waterkeepers Chesapeake v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Waterkeepers Chesapeake v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Geography
Year
2021
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2021
Status
License vacated and case remanded to FERC.
Geography
Docket number
21-1139
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.)
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US) → Clean Water Act (US)Federal Statutory Claims (US) → NEPA (US)Federal Statutory Claims (US) → Other Statutes and Regulations (US)
Principal law
United States → Administrative Procedure Act (APA)United States → Clean Water Act (CWA)United States → Federal Power ActUnited States → National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
At issue
Challenge to FERC's issuance of a new 50-year license for the Conowingo Hydroelectric Project in Maryland, including for failure to supplement the NEPA analysis to consider new information on climate change.
Topics
, ,  
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
12/20/2022
License vacated and case remanded to FERC.
The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) license for the Conowingo Dam on the Susquehanna River in Maryland, finding that FERC had exceeded its authority under section 401(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act, which permits FERC to issue a license only if the state certifies that the dam will comply with water quality standards or waives its authority to make this certification. Maryland initially granted a certification but then attempted to withdraw it and waive its authority. The court did not address arguments under NEPA that FERC was required to supplement its environmental analysis to consider new information on dredging and climate change. The petitioners had contended that the new information received after FERC issued its environmental impact statement (EIS) in 2015 showed that sediment pollution would be far worse than acknowledged in the EIS.
Decision
04/22/2022
Brief filed by intervenor Constellation Energy Generation, LLC.
Brief
04/22/2022
Brief filed by intervenor State of Maryland, Department of the Environment.
Brief
04/22/2022
Brief filed by intervenor U.S. Department of the Interior.
Brief
04/08/2022
Brief filed by Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
Brief
01/28/2022
Opening brief filed by petitioners.
Brief
Summary
Challenge to FERC's issuance of a new 50-year license for the Conowingo Hydroelectric Project in Maryland, including for failure to supplement the NEPA analysis to consider new information on climate change.
 Topics mentioned most in this case  Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance