In June 2026, the Federal Public Prosecutor's Office (MPF) filed a Public Civil Action (ACP) against Energisa Mato Grosso—Distribuidora de Energia SA, due to a large-scale fire that occurred in August 2024 in the Serra das Araras Ecological Station (ESEC), a fully protected conservation unit located in the state of Mato Grosso. Plaintiff alleges that the origin of one of the three ignition points of the fire was identified in the right-of-way of the medium-voltage power grid under Defendant's responsibility and that there is, in the records, technical, expert, and testimonial evidence that clearly points to a failure in preventive maintenance and the absence of firebreaks and vegetation pruning near the support poles and conductor cables. The MPF alleges that Defendant allowed dry branches to come into contact with the wiring, causing sparks and establishing a fire ignition point on a day of low humidity and strong winds, which generated a considerable part of the forest fire that affected the ESEC. The MPF further argues that forest fires in protected areas produce serious socio-environmental and ecological effects, soil erosion, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The MPF points out that the Protected Area Management Plan highlights the unit's vulnerability to forest fires caused by external interference and that the Plan recommends the adoption of permanent preventive measures and surveillance within the right-of-way of power lines. 

It is estimated that the large-scale fire caused the devastation of approximately 4,500 hectares, which, added to other fires resulting from ignition points in the vicinity, totals approximately 104,592.00 hectares devastated. The MPF alleges that Defendant was negligent, resulting in damage to neighboring rural properties and also to the Serra das Araras Ecological Station, justifying civil liability for the environmental damage caused to the community. It is noteworthy that the MPF offered a Conduct Adjustment Agreement (TAC) to Defendant but that the company declined, arguing that there are no grounds for liability. 

Plaintiff argues, based on Article 225 of the Brazilian Federal Constitution of 1988, the duty of the public authorities and the community to preserve the environment for present and future generations. Plaintiff also cites Advisory Opinion 23/2017 (PC-23/2017) of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, in which States Parties must adopt the precautionary principle and develop contingency plans to mitigate major environmental accidents; Advisory Opinion 32/2025 (PC-32/2025) of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, which recognized that the obligation to ensure due diligence imposes enhanced due diligence in the context of the climate crisis, by the State and private individuals, adopting preventive measures. It is argued that, in addition to the local damage caused to fauna, flora, and human health, the situation caused diffuse climate damage due to the release of GHG and the elimination of natural carbon sinks. It is argued that climate damage should be measured based on the carbon stock affected by the destruction of vegetation, and the pricing of this stock should be carried out using the calculator available in the CNJ's (National Council of Justice) Protocol for Judging Environmental Actions. 

The expert report from the Federal Police confirmed the occurrence of an electrical origin consistent with an electric arc and estimated the value of the direct environmental damage at R$ 11,917.76 per hectare. To arrive at this value, it was considered that 4,500 hectares were degraded, and it is argued that the value of the material environmental damage should be recognized as R$ 53,629,920.00. According to the carbon calculator, the monetary value of CO2 emissions is R$ 29,472,329.76, considering that the dollar exchange rate on that day was R$ 4.89. It is argued that this amount should be donated in the following proportions: 40% to ICMBio, 20% to IBAMA, 20% to the Mato Grosso Military Fire Department, and 20% to projects developed by the State University of Mato Grosso (UNEMAT) and the Federal University of Mato Grosso (UFMT) related to the study of fire and its impacts on the Cerrado and Pantanal biomes. 


It is alleged that, given the increased risk of fires due to high temperatures and the abrupt arrival of El Niño, preventive measures are necessary, and therefore, Defendant must present and implement an emergency plan within 30 days. In an urgent injunction, the presentation and implementation of an emergency plan is requested, with the objective of preventive maintenance of the electrical grid in the easement strip that crosses and borders the Serra das Araras Ecological Station Conservation Unit and neighboring properties. On the merits, it is requested: that Defendant be ordered to (i) pay damages for material losses corresponding to 4,500 hectares of degraded land, in the amount of R$ 53,629,920.00; (ii) compensate for diffuse moral damages, in the amount of R$ 26,814,960, equivalent to 50% of the proven material damages; (iii) compensate for the climatic damages caused, corresponding to R$ 29,472,329.76; and (iv) implement a continuous preventive maintenance plan for the electrical grid, which will include the cleaning and pruning of native vegetation to prevent contact with the distribution network, in the easement strip of the Conservation Unit.

Ministério Público Federal vs Energisa Mato Grosso – Distribuidora de Energia S.A (Fire at the Serra das Araras Ecological Station)

<p>This entry was provided by the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law. Please see the terms of use for citation and licensing of third party data.</p>

Ministério Público Federal vs Energisa Mato Grosso – Distribuidora de Energia S.A (Fire at the Serra das Araras Ecological Station) - complaint

Filed

Brazil

Mato Grosso

The Climate Litigation Database

Find climate change litigation data and indicators for {text}.

{text} litigation

Sabin Center for Climate Change Law provides Climate Litigation Database, a comprehensive database of US and Global climate change caselaw

Quickly and easily search through the complete text of thousands of climate change law and policy documents from every country.

Search the Climate Litigation Database

An aim to achieve a quantifiable outcome within a given time-frame, set by an institution such as a national government.

Policy instruments are techniques or tools used by governing authorities to promote certain policies in order to achieve predetermined goals. Put simply, instruments are how a government tries to achieve its goals, with this taxonomy being focused on national policy instruments.

Risk is the potential for adverse consequences resulting from the dynamic interplay between (climate-related) hazards, exposure, and vulnerability of affected human or ecological systems.

Groups  of people who are adversely affected by climate change or the response to it

A set of principles, processes, and practices that build economic and political power to shift from an extractive economy to a regenerative economy.

Justice is the ethical and political framework that addresses fairness, including issues of responsibility, rights, and structural inequity.

Renewable energy means all forms of energy produced from renewable sources in a sustainable manner.

Fossil fuel is a generic term for non-renewable energy sources such as coal, fossil gas, and oil (including crude oil, and petroleum products), that can be used for electricity and heat generation. Fossil fuels are hydrocarbons formed from pressurised and heated organic material buried over millions of years.

Molecules in the atmosphere that play a key role in the greenhouse effect by trapping heat radiating from Earth’s surface.

Area of the economy in which actors engage in identical or related activities.

In human systems, the process of adjustment to actual or expected climate change and its effects, in order to moderate harm, increase resilience or exploit beneficial opportunities. In natural systems, the process of adjustment to actual climate change and its effects; human intervention may facilitate adjustment to expected climate change and its effects.

The management and allocation of funds, assets and investments to meet various objectives

Zoning and spatial planning are both methods for guiding the distribution of people and activities in a space, and are regulatory restriction.

The processes through which enterprises can identify, prevent, mitigate and account for how they address their actual and potential adverse impacts. Due diligence is the idea that reasonable precautions should be taken to avoid causing harm to people, the environment, or society. It also involves identifying and mitigating risks before they occur.

Financial actors and resources that are primarily directed towards climate change mitigation, adaptation and compensation.

Dedicated pool of financial resources for climate-related projects.

A company that is owned wholly or partially by the state, typically operating in key sectors.

Either money or something of monetary value is transferred between two or more organisations, people or countries.

Actions or measures to adapt terrestrial systems to climate change.

Actions or measures to adapt freshwater systems to climate change.

Actions or measures to adapt freshwater, coastal and marine systems to climate change.

The release of heat-trapping gases, primarily from human activities such as burning fossil fuels, agriculture and industry.

A long-lived, colourless gas, chiefly emitted from fossil fuel combustion, deforestation and cement production.

A potent, short-lived greehouse gas, largely released from livestock, fossil fuel extraction and waste management.

Actions to reduce emissions in energy generation and supply.

Extreme weather refers to events where a weather variable exceeds (or falls below) a threshold. Meaning it is significantly different from the average or usual weather pattern.

A drought is an extended period of unusually dry weather marked by a significant and sustained lack of precipitation, falling below a specific threshold over a large area for more than a month

Terrestrial means "of the earth" and relates to the risks to ecological system that includes all living organisms and their interactions within land-based environments, such as forests, grasslands, and deserts.

Air pollution involves harmful contaminants in the air, affecting both indoor and outdoor environments. It can lead to health issues like respiratory diseases and heart problems, and climate impacts such as global warming. Pollutants can damage plants, trees, habitats, and water bodies like rivers and lakes.

Fossil gas, commonly known as natural gas, is a fossil fuel consisting chiefly of methane with smaller amounts of other hydrocarbons and trace gases, found in underground deposits.

Jobs that contribute to preserving or restoring the environment. We include jobs which require a high amount of green skills or which spend much of their time on green activities, as well as jobs transforming polluting industries.

This sector involves managing waste treatment, sanitation, pollution control and environmental cleanup.

This sector includes firms and individuals offering specialised expertise in fields such as law, accounting, consulting, science and engineering.

This sector involves the distribution, treatment, and conservation of water resources.

Climate change can have a range of impacts on technological system. Extreme weather events can cause infrastructure failures like power outages or damage to roads and bridges, as well as the impacts from waste following natural disasters. Human activities also cause technological impacts, such as the risks posed by oil spillage and leaks.

Any substance with chemical properties that can cause physical harm to people or damage the environment, including ammonia, carbon monoxide, phosphine, chlorine, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, pesticides, dioxins, microplastics, benzene, asbestos, aflatoxins, fluoride, methanol, and toxins from marine sources.

Climate change impacts our society by disrupting the natural, economic and social systems we depend on. Physical hazards and underlying vulnerabilities can lead to increased resource competition for food and water, which can heighten the risk of conflict.

Slow onset events evolve gradually from incremental changes over many years or from increased frequency or intensity of recurring events. As defined in the Cancun Adaptation Framework (2010), slow onset events include risks and impacts from rising temperatures, desertification, biodiversity loss, land and forest degradation, glacial retreat, ocean acidification, sea level rise, and salinization.

Geohazards are adverse geological phenomenon's that are capable of causing widespread damage or loss to property, life and the environment, such as earthquakes, volcano eruptions and tsunamis. Climate change can increase the frequency and severity of some geohazards, such as landslides, and soil erosion.

In June 2026, the Federal Public Prosecutor's Office (MPF) filed a Public Civil Action (ACP) against Energisa Mato Grosso—Distribuidora de Energia SA, due to a large-scale fire that occurred in August 2024 in the Serra das Araras Ecological Station (ESEC), a fully protected conservation unit located in the state of Mato Grosso. Plaintiff alleges that the origin of one of the three ignition points of the fire was identified in the right-of-way of the medium-voltage power grid under Defendant's responsibility and that there is, in the records, technical, expert, and testimonial evidence that clearly points to a failure in preventive maintenance and the absence of firebreaks and vegetation pruning near the support poles and conductor cables. The MPF alleges that Defendant allowed dry branches to come into contact with the wiring, causing sparks and establishing a fire ignition point on a day of low humidity and strong winds, which generated a considerable part of the forest fire that affected the ESEC. The MPF further argues that forest fires in protected areas produce serious socio-environmental and ecological effects, soil erosion, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The MPF points out that the Protected Area Management Plan highlights the unit's vulnerability to forest fires caused by external interference and that the Plan recommends the adoption of permanent preventive measures and surveillance within the right-of-way of power lines. 

It is estimated that the large-scale fire caused the devastation of approximately 4,500 hectares, which, added to other fires resulting from ignition points in the vicinity, totals approximately 104,592.00 hectares devastated. The MPF alleges that Defendant was negligent, resulting in damage to neighboring rural properties and also to the Serra das Araras Ecological Station, justifying civil liability for the environmental damage caused to the community. It is noteworthy that the MPF offered a Conduct Adjustment Agreement (TAC) to Defendant but that the company declined, arguing that there are no grounds for liability. 

Plaintiff argues, based on Article 225 of the Brazilian Federal Constitution of 1988, the duty of the public authorities and the community to preserve the environment for present and future generations. Plaintiff also cites Advisory Opinion 23/2017 (PC-23/2017) of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, in which States Parties must adopt the precautionary principle and develop contingency plans to mitigate major environmental accidents; Advisory Opinion 32/2025 (PC-32/2025) of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, which recognized that the obligation to ensure due diligence imposes enhanced due diligence in the context of the climate crisis, by the State and private individuals, adopting preventive measures. It is argued that, in addition to the local damage caused to fauna, flora, and human health, the situation caused diffuse climate damage due to the release of GHG and the elimination of natural carbon sinks. It is argued that climate damage should be measured based on the carbon stock affected by the destruction of vegetation, and the pricing of this stock should be carried out using the calculator available in the CNJ's (National Council of Justice) Protocol for Judging Environmental Actions. 

The expert report from the Federal Police confirmed the occurrence of an electrical origin consistent with an electric arc and estimated the value of the direct environmental damage at R$ 11,917.76 per hectare. To arrive at this value, it was considered that 4,500 hectares were degraded, and it is argued that the value of the material environmental damage should be recognized as R$ 53,629,920.00. According to the carbon calculator, the monetary value of CO2 emissions is R$ 29,472,329.76, considering that the dollar exchange rate on that day was R$ 4.89. It is argued that this amount should be donated in the following proportions: 40% to ICMBio, 20% to IBAMA, 20% to the Mato Grosso Military Fire Department, and 20% to projects developed by the State University of Mato Grosso (UNEMAT) and the Federal University of Mato Grosso (UFMT) related to the study of fire and its impacts on the Cerrado and Pantanal biomes. 


It is alleged that, given the increased risk of fires due to high temperatures and the abrupt arrival of El Niño, preventive measures are necessary, and therefore, Defendant must present and implement an emergency plan within 30 days. In an urgent injunction, the presentation and implementation of an emergency plan is requested, with the objective of preventive maintenance of the electrical grid in the easement strip that crosses and borders the Serra das Araras Ecological Station Conservation Unit and neighboring properties. On the merits, it is requested: that Defendant be ordered to (i) pay damages for material losses corresponding to 4,500 hectares of degraded land, in the amount of R$ 53,629,920.00; (ii) compensate for diffuse moral damages, in the amount of R$ 26,814,960, equivalent to 50% of the proven material damages; (iii) compensate for the climatic damages caused, corresponding to R$ 29,472,329.76; and (iv) implement a continuous preventive maintenance plan for the electrical grid, which will include the cleaning and pruning of native vegetation to prevent contact with the distribution network, in the easement strip of the Conservation Unit. 

Ministério Público Federal vs Energisa Mato Grosso – Distribuidora de Energia S.A (Fire at the Serra das Araras Ecological Station) - complaint

Policy instrument

Risk

Impacted group

Just transition

Fossil fuel

Greenhouse gas

Economic sector

Adaptation/resilience

Finance