- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- Association of Washington Business v. Washington S...
Collection
Association of Washington Business v. Washington State Department of Ecology
Association of Washington Business v. Washington State Department of Ecology ↗
95885-8Wash.7 entries
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
01/16/2020
Decision
Trial court ruling that rule exceeded Ecology’s authority affirmed but remedy modified to invalidate rule only to the extent it regulated nonemitters via an emission standard.
The Washington Supreme Court concluded that the Washington Clean Air Act did not grant the Department of Ecology authority to regulate indirect greenhouse gas emissions of businesses and utilities whose products ultimately generate such emissions. The court therefore invalidated regulations promulgated by Ecology to the extent the rules regulated “nonemitters” (i.e., petroleum product producers and importers and natural gas distributors) but allowed the regulations’ continued application to “actual emitters.” Ecology projected that the emissions from combustion of products sold by these “nonemitters” or “indirect emitters” accounted for approximately 74% of the emissions covered by the regulations.
11/20/2018
Reply
Reply brief filed by intervenor-appellants Washington Environmental Council et al.
–
Avista Corp. v. Washington State Department of Ecology ↗
16-2-03966-34Wash. Super. Ct.1 entry
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
Association of Washington Business v. Washington State Department of Ecology ↗
16-2-03923-34Wash. Super. Ct.3 entries
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
04/27/2018
Decision
Petition for judicial review granted and Clean Air Rule declared invalid.
A Washington Superior Court issued a written ruling holding that the Clean Air Rule exceeded the Department of Ecology's statutory authority to adopt emission standards because the Rule regulated "indirect emitters" such as natural gas distributors and petroleum product producers that did not directly introduce contaminants into the air. The court also found that the regulation of indirect emitters was fundamental to the entire Clean Air Rule and therefore found that the entire rule was invalid.
12/15/2017
Decision
Order issued from bench finding that agency lacked authority to promulgate provisions in rule.
–
A Washington state court <a href="http://www.thenewstribune.com/news/local/article190568904.html">ruled</a> from the bench that the Washington Department of Ecology lacked statutory authority to promulgate a component of its Clean Air Rule that regulated petroleum and natural gas suppliers. The Clean Air Rule capped and reduced greenhouse gas emissions from significant in-state stationary sources; petroleum product producers, importers, and distributors; and natural gas distributors operating within Washington. It was promulgated as a step towards achieving statutory targets for greenhouse gas emissions reductions. The court said it would take additional briefs on whether to sever the Clean Air Rule’s provisions for stationary sources or to invalidate the entire rule.
09/27/2016
Petition
Petition for judicial review and declaratory judgment filed.
Eight business and trade groups filed a challenge to Washington’s “Clean Air Rule” in Washington Superior Court. The petitioners contended that the legislature had not delegated the Washington Department of Ecology the authority to establish Clean Air Rule’s greenhouse gas regulatory program, which Ecology established at the instruction of the governor. In addition, the petitioners asserted that Ecology’s adoption of the regulations violated the State Environmental Policy Act because an environmental impact statement should have been prepared. The petitioners also said that the program violated the Administrative Procedure Act because of its arbitrary treatment of Energy Intensive, Trade Exposed industries and based on arbitrary cost-benefit analysis and least-burdensome alternative analysis. The petitioners also alleged violations of Washington’s Regulatory Fairness Act, which requires preparation of a small business economic impact statement, and of the Washington constitution’s limits on taxation.