- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Washington
- /
- Association of Washington Business v. Washington State Department of Ecology
Association of Washington Business v. Washington State Department of Ecology
Geography
Year
2016
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2016
Status
Petition for judicial review granted and Clean Air Rule declared invalid.
Geography
Docket number
16-2-03923-34
Court/admin entity
United States → State Courts → Washington Superior Court (Wash. Super. Ct.)
Case category
State Law Claims (US) → Industry Lawsuits (US)State Law Claims (US) → State Impact Assessment Laws (US)
Principal law
United States → Washington State Environmental Policy Act
At issue
Challenge by business and trade groups to greenhouse gas regulations adopted by the Washington Department of Ecology.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
04/27/2018
Petition for judicial review granted and Clean Air Rule declared invalid.
A Washington Superior Court issued a written ruling holding that the Clean Air Rule exceeded the Department of Ecology's statutory authority to adopt emission standards because the Rule regulated "indirect emitters" such as natural gas distributors and petroleum product producers that did not directly introduce contaminants into the air. The court also found that the regulation of indirect emitters was fundamental to the entire Clean Air Rule and therefore found that the entire rule was invalid.
Decision
09/27/2016
Petition for judicial review and declaratory judgment filed.
Eight business and trade groups filed a challenge to Washington’s “Clean Air Rule” in Washington Superior Court. The petitioners contended that the legislature had not delegated the Washington Department of Ecology the authority to establish Clean Air Rule’s greenhouse gas regulatory program, which Ecology established at the instruction of the governor. In addition, the petitioners asserted that Ecology’s adoption of the regulations violated the State Environmental Policy Act because an environmental impact statement should have been prepared. The petitioners also said that the program violated the Administrative Procedure Act because of its arbitrary treatment of Energy Intensive, Trade Exposed industries and based on arbitrary cost-benefit analysis and least-burdensome alternative analysis. The petitioners also alleged violations of Washington’s Regulatory Fairness Act, which requires preparation of a small business economic impact statement, and of the Washington constitution’s limits on taxation.
Petition
Summary
Challenge by business and trade groups to greenhouse gas regulations adopted by the Washington Department of Ecology.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance