- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Vermont
- /
- Chamber of Commerce of the United States of Americ...
Litigation
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. Moore
About this case
Documents
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
09/15/2025
Motion For Summary Judgment
Memorandum filed by intervenor states in support of their motion for summary judgment and opposition to defendants' motions to dismiss.
–
09/15/2025
Motion For Summary Judgment
Memorandum filed by plaintiffs in support of their motion for partial summary judgment on Counts I and II.
–
08/26/2025
Amicus Motion/Brief
Brief filed by economists Joseph E. Stiglitz et al. as amici curiae.
–
08/22/2025
Motion To Dismiss
Memorandum of law filed in support of intervenor-defendants' motion to dismiss.
–
08/15/2025
Motion To Dismiss
Memorandum of law filed in support of defendants' motion to dismiss.
–
06/30/2025
Decision
Organizations' motion to intervene granted.
In the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and American Petroleum Institute’s lawsuit challenging Vermont’s Climate Superfund Act, the federal district court for the District of Vermont granted Northeast Organic Farming Association of Vermont and the Conservation Law Foundation’s motion to intervene to defend the law. The organizations alleged that climate change had harmed their members and that implementation of the law could benefit their members. The court found that the relevant factors weighed in favor of granting permissive intervention.
06/25/2025
Motion
Stipulated motion filed to set briefing schedule.
The parties proposed a briefing schedule that would coordinate the briefing for this case with the <a href="https://climatecasechart.com/case/99017/">case</a> filed by the United States.
05/01/2025
Complaint
Complaint in intervention filed by West Virginia and 23 other states.
West Virginia and 23 other states filed a complaint in intervention in federal district court for the District of Vermont in the case brought by the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and American Petroleum Institute challenging Vermont’s Climate Superfund Act, which established a Climate Superfund Cost Recovery Program to be funded with payments by fossil fuel companies that extracted fossil fuels or refined crude oil from 1995 to 2024. The states alleged that the law is a “retroactive and extraterritorial shakedown” that is precluded by the Constitution’s “inherent structure,” is preempted by the Clean Air Act, violates the domestic and foreign Commerce Clauses, violates the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment and due process and equal protection principles in the Vermont Constitution, imposes an excessive fine in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, constitutes an unconstitutional taking under the Fifth Amendment and Vermont Constitution, and violates the Vermont Constitution’s separation of powers clause.
12/30/2024
Complaint
Complaint filed.
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and American Petroleum Institute filed a lawsuit in the federal district court for the District of Vermont challenging Vermont’s Climate Superfund Act, which established a Climate Superfund Cost Recovery Program to be funded by payments, based on a standard of strict liability, from companies that engaged in fossil fuel extraction or crude oil refining between 1995 and 2024 to which more than one billion metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions can be attributed. The Program is to fund climate adaptation programs in the state. The plaintiffs asserted that the Vermont law is precluded by the U.S. Constitution, including constitutional principles that require that federal law govern matters concerning “uniquely federal interests” such as interstate and global greenhouse gas emissions and that recognize the “equal sovereignty” of all states. The plaintiffs contended that these and other constitutional principles restrict states from legislating in ways that extend beyond their borders. The plaintiffs also asserted that the Vermont law is preempted by the Clean Air Act; violates the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause; violates the domestic and foreign Commerce Clauses; imposes an excessive fine in violation of the Eighth Amendment; and effects an unconstitutional taking under the Fifth Amendment. The plaintiffs requested declaratory and injunctive relief, as well as attorneys’ fees and costs.
Summary
Challenge to Vermont’s Climate Superfund Act, which established a Climate Superfund Cost Recovery Program to fund adaptation projects with payments by fossil fuel companies.