Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database
Litigation

Energy Transfer LP v. Gion

About this case

Documents

Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
04/24/2024
Decision
Petition for supervisory writ denied.
04/19/2024
Response
Response to petition for supervisory writ filed by Greenpeace defendants.
04/12/2024
Decision
Motion for stay granted.
04/10/2024
Petition
Petition for supervisory writ filed.
Energy Transfer petitioned the North Dakota Supreme Court to issue a writ to protect the company from "unnecessary and harassing discovery." Energy Transfer said the discovery sought by Greenpeace and allowed by the district court included a deposition of Energy Transfer's former CEO Kelcy Warren and "a massive and ill-defined set of pipeline-safety documents." Energy Transfer described Warren as "a classic apex witness" without "any unique and otherwise unobtainable knowledge, a basic requirement for an apex deposition." Regarding pipeline-safety documents, Energy Transfer said it had withdrawn "all defamation claims predicated on Greenpeace's water- and climate-related statements," making the documents "patently irrelevant to any pending claim."

Summary

Lawsuit by the developers of the Dakota Access Pipeline seeking damages from organizations and individuals who protested the pipeline.