- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- District of Columbia
- /
- Healthy Gulf v. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management
Healthy Gulf v. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management
Geography
Year
2024
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2024
Status
Summary judgment granted for defendants.
Geography
Docket number
1:24-cv-02175
Court/admin entity
United States → United States District Court for the District of Columbia (D.D.C.)United States → United States Federal Courts
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US) → Other Statutes and Regulations (US)
Principal law
United States → Administrative Procedure Act (APA)United States → Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA)
At issue
Challenge to Bureau of Ocean Energy Management's 2020 final rule on air quality control, reporting, and compliance for offshore oil and gas operations.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
03/23/2026
Summary judgment granted for defendants.
The federal district court for the District of Columbia upheld a final rule adopted under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA) in 2020 by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) to regulate compliance with national ambient air quality standards under the Clean Air Act to the extent activities authorized under OCSLA “significantly affect the air quality of any state.” The court rejected environmental organizations’ claims that the final rule had kept in place “outdated and ineffective regulations,” rather than adopting significant changes in the 2016 proposed rule. The court found that the organizations sought to expand BOEM’s mandate beyond the “proper statutory mandate.” The court also rejected the organizations’ claims that BOEM’s cost-benefit analysis was arbitrary and capricious, that BOEM failed to provide a reasoned explanation for its decisions, and that BOEM failed to consider “important aspects of the problem of offshore oil and gas pollution.”
Decision
04/18/2025
Memorandum of points and authorities filed by intervenor-defendant American Petroleum Institute in support of its cross-motion for summary judgment and in opposition to plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment.
Motion For Summary Judgment
04/18/2025
Memorandum filed in support of BOEM's combined cross motion for summary judgment and opposition to plaintiffs' summary judgment motion.
Motion For Summary Judgment
07/24/2024
Complaint filed.
Environmental organizations filed a lawsuit in federal district court in the District of Columbia challenging a Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) 2020 final rule on air quality control, reporting, and compliance. They alleged that the rule—which “scrapped” major updates proposed in 2016—“kept in place outdated and ineffective regulations governing air pollution from offshore oil and gas operations that were promulgated in 1980, rejecting significant changes that the Bureau had previously determined were needed to ensure compliance with its statutory mandates under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act [(OCSLA)].” The plaintiffs contended that BOEM did not provide reasoned explanations for retaining outdated regulations, including for its determination that it was unable to regulate methane pursuant to the OCSLA. The complaint asserted violations of OCSLA and the Administrative Procedure Act. The groups asked the court to issue a declaratory judgment, set aside and vacate the rule, and order BOEM to promulgate a new rule.
Complaint
Summary
Challenge to Bureau of Ocean Energy Management's 2020 final rule on air quality control, reporting, and compliance for offshore oil and gas operations.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance